Search:  

 
 
   All ForumsHot TopicsGallery






how-to block ads


 
Forums » Up and Running » Security » Security » Microsoft Security Bulletins for 13 July 2004
Search Topic:
Uniqs:
1433
Share Topic:
RSS topic:
toggle:
flat / full
normal / watch
Posting:
Post a:
Post a:
Infektion Group/Chessmaster Link »
« McAfee Internet Security Suite is solid  
page: 1 · 2
AuthorAll Replies


Steve
I'm a PC, so shut up
Consultant
join:2001-03-10
Yorba Linda, CA


2 edits
Microsoft Security Bulletins for 13 July 2004

Our usual Microsoft host Jerry ( JmanB See Profile) is on an airplane to Atlanta right now, and I've been asked to post this for him and Emily (the new Security lead).

I do not represent or speak for Microsoft.


13 July 2004

Today Microsoft released the following Security Bulletins.

Note: www.microsoft.com/technet/security and www.microsoft.com/security are authoritative in all matters concerning Microsoft Security Bulletins! ANY e-mail, web board or newsgroup posting (including this one) should be verified by visiting these sites for official information. Microsoft never sends security or other updates as attachments. These updates must be downloaded from the microsoft.com download center or Windows Update. See the individual bulletins for details.

Because some malicious messages attempt to masquerade as official Microsoft security notices, it is recommended that you physically type the URLs into your web browser and not click on the hyperlinks provided.

Bulletin Summaries:
http://www.microsoft.com/technet/security/bulletin/ms04-jul.mspx

Critical Bulletins:

MS04-022 - Vulnerability in Task Scheduler Could Allow Code Execution (841873)

http://www.microsoft.com/technet/security/bulletin/ms04-022.mspx

MS04-023 - Vulnerability in HTML Help Could Allow Code Execution (840315)

http://www.microsoft.com/technet/security/bulletin/ms04-023.mspx

Important Bulletins:

MS04-019 - Vulnerability in Utility Manager Could Allow Code Execution (842526)

http://www.microsoft.com/technet/security/bulletin/ms04-019.mspx

MS04-020 - Vulnerability in POSIX Could Allow Code Execution (841872)

http://www.microsoft.com/technet/security/bulletin/ms04-020.mspx

MS04-021 - Security Update for IIS 4.0 (841373)

http://www.microsoft.com/technet/security/bulletin/ms04-021.mspx

MS04-024 - Vulnerability in Windows Shell Could Allow Remote Code Execution (839645)

http://www.microsoft.com/technet/security/bulletin/ms04-024.mspx

Moderate Bulletins:

MS04-018 - Cumulative Security Update for Outlook Express (823353)

http://www.microsoft.com/technet/security/bulletin/ms04-018.mspx

This represents our regularly scheduled monthly bulletin release (second Tuesday of each month). Please note that Microsoft may release bulletins out side of this schedule if we determine the need to do so.

If you have any questions regarding the patch or its implementation after reading the above listed bulletin you should contact Product Support Services in the United States at 1-866-PCSafety (1-866-727-2338). International customers should contact their local subsidiary.


--
Stephen J. Friedl * Security Consultant * Tustin, California USA * my web site


gkweb

join:2003-06-09
76800


1 edit
After installing the updates, I have noticed that two files were modified (firewall alert) :

WINDOWS\system32\ws2_32.dll
MD5 - 20C6D9F9522DDA0F9A8E4B8641CA9245

WINDOWS\system32\mswsock.dll
MD5 - 461B467CAE39D0A2765C876B46E78A7C

Is it the same for everyone ?

(French XP + SP1 + last critical updates)


koam
Pink Pecker
Premium
join:2000-08-16
East Puddle
clubs:
reply to Steve
Um, as an end user, will these things get to me via Windows Update for XP or are they something I should be doing supplementary to WU?

Thanks.
--
Danieli Consulting LLC, Strategy and Brandinghttp://kdanieli.com


Steve
I'm a PC, so shut up
Consultant
join:2001-03-10
Yorba Linda, CA
I'm quite sure that these will be available on Windows Update.

Steve


Randy Bell
Premium
join:2002-02-24
Santa Clara, CA

reply to koam
said by koam See Profile:
Um, as an end user, will these things get to me via Windows Update for XP or are they something I should be doing supplementary to WU?
There were five of them via WU this morning for my Windows XP box, requiring a reboot. There were two of them via WU for my son's Win98SE box, requiring no reboot. I think you should be able to get them via {manual or automatic} WU.
--
"But now abide faith, hope, love, these three; but the greatest of these is love." (1 Cor. 13:13)

Daemon
Premium
join:2003-06-29
San Francisco, CA
·Comcast

It's not a security bulletin, but there is an additional critical update- BITS 2.0. (background intelligent transfer service). It's what Automatic Updates uses to download updates, and version 2.0 is much improved.

BITS 2.0 is what WU5 will use, so it looks like they are rolling it out to everyone in anticipation of WU5 and XP Sp2
--
-Ryan
01011000


koam
Pink Pecker
Premium
join:2000-08-16
East Puddle
clubs:
·Shoreham Telephone
·ViaTalk

reply to Randy Bell
Thanks Steve and Randy.

Yes I ran WU on 2 of our machines and found 5 or 6 critical updates for each. This after a slew of them in the past week as well.

In Add/Remove Programs, I have 23 Hotfixes on one machine (XP Home), 41 Hotfixes on the other (XP Pro).
--
Danieli Consulting LLC, Strategy and Brandinghttp://kdanieli.com


satburn
Premium
join:2003-06-03
Versailles, MO

reply to Steve
said by Steve See Profile:

Critical Bulletins:

MS04-022 - Vulnerability in Task Scheduler Could Allow Code Execution (841873)

I'm on the mailing list and got these at work. I shuddered when I saw it. Guess we know there's a trojan coming soon...


What is the scope of the vulnerability?
This is a remote code execution vulnerability. If a user is logged on with administrative privileges, an attacker who successfully exploited this vulnerability could take complete control of an affected system, including installing programs; viewing, changing, or deleting data; or creating new accounts with full privileges. Users whose accounts are configured to have fewer privileges on the system would be at less risk than users who operate with administrative privileges. However, user interaction is required to exploit this vulnerability.


So, all they have to do is click on attachment and execute it.... yeah, nobody will do that....
--
SRS|XP Pro|Intel 2.4 Ghz|500 RAM|60 GB HD|DAK403_P8|SatMex5|1230 MHz|Vertical|ZoneAlarm|NOD32

jpeachman

join:2000-05-23
Pittsburg, CA

reply to gkweb
said by gkweb See Profile:
After installing the updates, I have noticed that two files were modified (firewall alert) :

WINDOWS\system32\ws2_32.dll
MD5 - 20C6D9F9522DDA0F9A8E4B8641CA9245

WINDOWS\system32\mswsock.dll
MD5 - 461B467CAE39D0A2765C876B46E78A7C

Is it the same for everyone ?

(French XP + SP1 + last critical updates)
Must be some of the XP-only updates. After updating W2K SP4, the files you mentioned (which both exist on my system, though of course in WINNT\system32 instead) have not been updated or changed.

Joe


trparky
Bite My Shiny Metal Ass
Premium,MVM
join:2000-05-24
Cleveland, OH
clubs:
Is Windows XP Service Pack 2 RC2 users effected?
--
WedgeAntilles250

jpeachman

join:2000-05-23
Pittsburg, CA


1 edit
Sorry WedgeAntilles250, I'm not sure I understand your question. There were various updates today for all versions of Windows, but the question I was responding to asked whether everyone had the same 2 specific files updated (there are plenty of others, too), and I was just saying I didn't on W2K.

If you run Windows Update, it will tell you what is available for your particular Windows version. If you have a different specific question, could you clarify?

Joe

boblandy
Premium
join:2002-05-06

reply to gkweb
said by gkweb See Profile:
After installing the updates, I have noticed that two files were modified (firewall alert) :
WINDOWS\system32\ws2_32.dll
MD5 - 20C6D9F9522DDA0F9A8E4B8641CA9245
WINDOWS\system32\mswsock.dll
MD5 - 461B467CAE39D0A2765C876B46E78A7C
Is it the same for everyone ?
(French XP + SP1 + last critical updates)
neither of these 2 files have been modified on my winxp after installing the critical updates
--
look out kid they keep it all hid


trparky
Bite My Shiny Metal Ass
Premium,MVM
join:2000-05-24
Cleveland, OH
clubs:
Is Windows XP Service Pack 2 vulnerable to these exploits?
--
WedgeAntilles250


evilpeppard
Always Fight For Freedom
Premium
join:2003-08-20
Aurora, CO
clubs:

said by trparky See Profile:
Is Windows XP Service Pack 2 vulnerable to these exploits?

I believe one of them did affect users with XP SP2 installed, but only if it was the beta version of XP SP2. Don't quote me though. I'm at home now so I don't have the info from work where I originally saw this.

I'd just run WU and install the criticals.
--
ASUS A7N8X Deluxe rev 2.0 w/AMD 3200+ Barton, 1GB Matched Corsair DDR400 RAM, WD Raptor 10K RPM SATA HD's in RAID 0, EVGA FX5900 Ultra 256mb NVidia, WinXP Pro,Logitech z-5300 speakers


Morac

join:2001-08-30
Riverside, NJ
·Comcast

reply to Steve
quote:
Fixes a behavior that was introduced in MS03-014 where Outlook Express 6 SP1 and later creates a copy of the Windows Address Book in a predictable location with a file name of ~. After you install this update, Outlook Express will no longer create this copy of the Windows Address Book in a predictable location.
Finally!
--

The Comcast Disney Avatar has been retired.

Daemon
Premium
join:2003-06-29
San Francisco, CA
·Comcast

said by Morac See Profile:
quote:
Fixes a behavior that was introduced in MS03-014 where Outlook Express 6 SP1 and later creates a copy of the Windows Address Book in a predictable location with a file name of ~. After you install this update, Outlook Express will no longer create this copy of the Windows Address Book in a predictable location.
Finally!

Now it's going to make ~ files all over the disk in random places!
--
-Ryan
01011000

Mele20
Premium
join:2001-06-05
Hilo, HI
reply to Steve
Why does WU version 5 tell me that it needs to upgrade itself before I can get any updates? I just installed version 5 about a week ago and it already needs to upgrade?


ObdH
Premium
join:2003-06-11

reply to Steve
said by user=windowsupdate:
Security Update for Windows 2000 (KB840315)
Download size: 310 KB
A security issue has been identified that could allow an attacker to compromise a computer running Windows and gain control over it. You can help protect your computer by installing this update from Microsoft. After you install this item, you may have to restart your computer. Read more...

Remove
Security Update for Windows 2000 (KB842526)
Download size: 310 KB
A security issue has been identified that could allow an attacker to compromise your Windows-based system and gain control over it. You can help protect your computer by installing this update from Microsoft. After you install this item, you may have to restart your computer. Read more...

Remove
Security Update for Windows 2000 (KB841873)
Download size: 311 KB
A security issue has been identified that could allow an attacker to compromise your Windows-based system and gain control over it. You can help protect your computer by installing this update from Microsoft. After you install this item, you may have to restart your computer. Read more...

Remove
Security Update for Windows 2000 (KB841872)
Download size: 346 KB
A security issue has been identified that could allow an attacker to compromise your Windows-based system and gain control over it. You can help protect your computer by installing this update from Microsoft. After you install this item, you may have to restart your computer. Read more...

Remove
Security Update for Windows 2000 (KB839645)
Download size: 310 KB
A security issue has been identified that could allow an attacker to compromise a computer running Windows and gain control over it. You can help protect your computer by installing this update from Microsoft. After you install this item, you may have to restart your computer. Read more...
Well...atleast they're blunt about it! Surely that's a good sign
--
Miserable failure


bcool
Premium
join:2000-08-25
The Ozarks

reply to Mele20
said by Mele20 See Profile:
Why does WU version 5 tell me that it needs to upgrade itself before I can get any updates? I just installed version 5 about a week ago and it already needs to upgrade?

Oops. Hi Mele. I've been asleep at the wheel. I didn't even know there was a WU version 5 that's available for installation. Who, where, how?

Daemon
Premium
join:2003-06-29
San Francisco, CA
·Comcast

reply to Mele20
said by Mele20 See Profile:
Why does WU version 5 tell me that it needs to upgrade itself before I can get any updates? I just installed version 5 about a week ago and it already needs to upgrade?

because BITS 2.0 RTM is out. Last week you would have been using 2.0 RC2
--
-Ryan
01011000
Forums » Up and Running » Security » SecurityInfektion Group/Chessmaster Link »
« McAfee Internet Security Suite is solid  
page: 1 · 2


Wednesday, 09-Dec 11:41:28 Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Hosting by www.nac.net - DSL,Hosting & Co-lo | feedback | contact
over 10 years online! © 1999-2009 dslreports.com.
page compression OFF
Most commented news this week
· [197] Sprint Sued For Distracted Driving Death
· [81] 3G Network Test Says AT&T Is Tops
· [72] Mediacom Unveils 105 Mbps Pricing
· [65] Sprint Poised For A Turnaround?
· [57] WPA Cracker: Test WPA-PSK Networks In 20 Minutes
· [50] The Future Of Wi-Fi Is Bright
· [49] AT&T Launching New 24 Mbps U-Verse Tier
· [47] Site Leaks Yahoo, Verizon Fed Data Share Pricing
· [44] Microwaving Your Innards Is Not 'Extreme'
· [39] Verizon LTE: 5-12 Mbps Downstream
Most people now reading
· Comcast refused to install 400' feet. [Comcast HSI]
· Cross Server Dungeon Experience [World of Warcraft]
· Windows 7 boot manager editing questions [Microsoft Help]
· [How to] Install Asterisk on an Asus WL-520GU router [VOIP Tech Chat]
· IMG 1.7 (IMG Updates and Discussion) [Verizon FIOS TV]
· HOA Headaches [General Questions]
· [game] CG6 - Gunslinger - Day 1 [Pub Games]
· [Gold] Making a Killing on Patch Day [World of Warcraft]
· Is sleeping similar to being dead? [General Questions]
· Connecting to Google Voice Via SIP [VOIP Tech Chat]