pandora
Premium
join:2001-06-01
Outland
 ·ooma
·Future Nine Corpor..
 ·Comcast
4 edits | reply to Sveasoft6
Re: Sveasoft defamation
Let me ask the source.
1) The above picture is credited to Sveasoft, and was found where a would be redistributers attempt to offer a version of a Sveasoft GPL binary was made. Could you please indicate, IS this a jpg for which you are responsible or which you in any way have an affiliation with? If so, please explain your affiliation with the jpg. Explain if this is yours, why on investigation of a claim of censorship I should endure baseless slurs and profanity from your company?
2) Has Sveasoft written as it has been accused elsewhere on dslreports to either DSLReports, Yahoo.com or 30mb.com and complained about any persons seeking or distributing Sveasoft GPL source or binaries? If so, could you please explain the nature of the infraction in seeking a Sveasoft GPL source or binary in detail as to why they would not be permitted to redistribute or aquire GPL code from a place other than Sveasoft?
3) If you have ever writen moderators or webhosts to prevent redistribution of Sveasoft GPL code or binary or requests for the same, please explain the basis; do you assert a right to request moderators on this board or webhosts elsewhere to remove user requests or links for alternative redistribution of Sveasoft GPL code or binaries?
4) Is the email listed at a questioned website a legitimate transcript of email you exchanged with the user anne3154juul@yahoo.com. If not, can you please provide either a flat denial of any exchange of email from you or a link to your unedited email to that user?
5) Do you assert any right beyond GPL for source or binaries in development? That is do you make a claim to be able to preclude redistribution of GPL code AND binaries in development which a subscriber has obtained from your site (or a licensee has obtained from a redistribution under GPL), or do you assert any right to preclude redistribution of Alchemy source or binary in any way, provided the distribution retains gpl licensing? If so, please state the nature of the right.
Thanks, hey I'm looking forward to great or at least revealing answers!  |
