 scamd
join:2001-02-09 Dallas, TX | reply to jay_rm Re: [Vonage] Vonage + website down
Thursday, August 12, 2004, 12:05 PM No Web, and neither of my two lines have dialtone. 214 Dallas |
|
 MotoVT Vonage User Since Jan 2004
join:2002-12-03 Butler, PA | reply to jay_rm Works fine in AC 724 |
|
  Nuweb
@24.178.x.x
| reply to jay_rm mine (678 Atlanta) has been down sense 11:30 pm von.'s web site just came up recently though now my voicemail sounds choppy as all hell... but i still love the service lol ******i know this thread is old but a few people have replyed on current issues...***** |
|
 ltsincfun
join:2003-01-06 Walnut Creek, CA | reply to BayAreaGuy Vonage has been down in the San Francisco area for hours. Unable to access web site either. This is becoming too frequent.:( |
|
 The Way Out
join:2003-01-20 | reply to jay_rm This thread *was* 4 days old. ;( |
|
  BayAreaGuy
@comcast.net | reply to tekrik Having same problem in San Francisco Bay Area. It is 9:37PM here.
Website is down as well. |
|
  tekrik
join:2003-03-13 Chula Vista, CA | reply to jay_rm Yep having troubles here tonight....619 =( |
|
 sh00tfire
join:2004-01-16 Syracuse, UT | reply to Eric_M said by Eric_M: Back up in Salt Lake City (801)!
Not working here in Ogden UT (801)  |
|
  New2Vonage
| reply to jay_rm Still down for me in 971, Maryland. Website also still down... is anyone else still down tonight? Actually I guess we're into Sunday morning now. |
|
 garys_2k
join:2004-05-07 Farmington, MI
·Future Nine Corpor..
·Vonage
| reply to jay_rm Good point being rasied here. We all signed up for VoIP service that is new technology, uses the Internet (more new tech) and doesn't promise to be anything other than what they are. Yeah, it goes down a bit (but not much, imho). We have cells as backup, we save money. Seems like a fair trade to me. |
|
  visio
join:2001-08-29 Clifton, NJ
| reply to Pictor Guy Agreed. Personally the Vonage line is the only real line in my apt. If service goes out, *shrug*. I dont make Vonage pick up the slack because of my planning. Hows that saying go?
Lack of planning on your part doesnt constitute and emergency on ours. |
|
  dellsweig Extreme Aerobatics Premium,MVM join:2003-12-10 Campbell Hall, NY
·Time Warner VOIP
·Vonage
·RoadRunner Cable
| reply to jay_rm I would say people are alot more dependent on cell phone service AND the coverage, call quality, customer service, etc, etc USUALLY is sub-standard. AND IT COSTS A WHOLE LOT MORE AND IT IS A GOVERNMET REGULATED Industry...
Sure makes the current state of VoIP look GREAT
"can you hear me now"?? |
|
 Pictor Guy
join:2004-06-21 Sammamish, WA
| reply to visio said by visio : I dont understand why everyone has such as major issue with Vonage going down.
I think this brings up a more important issue. It seems VoIP isn't just on the fringe anymore. Based on peoples reactions it's central to peoples lives. VoIP was (and mostly still is) a second line for people. However, people are getting more and more dependent on the service. |
|
 garys_2k
join:2004-05-07 Farmington, MI 1 edit | reply to jay_rm In any case, I can now log into my dashboard (couldn't earlier) and I just called home and got through (to my answering machine, but the call seemed to work). So if there was a phone problem here (248) it's over now. |
|
  visio
join:2001-08-29 Clifton, NJ
| reply to jay_rm I dont understand why everyone has such as major issue with Vonage going down. It happens. Yes, I know, the Telco's dont go down as often as VOIP providers go down, but guess what..
(taken from Vonage TOS) 1.10 Service Distinctions You acknowledge and understand that the Service is not a telephone service. Important distinctions (some, but not necessarily all, of which are described in this Agreement) exist between telephone service and the enhanced Service offering provided by Vonage.
If a company says they arent a telephone service, and you're holding them to the same standards as a telephone service, it's not the company who's at fault. If you need a reliable telephone service (business, medical issues, etc) then you should sign up with a company that says theyre a telephone service. It's really that simple.
Looking as a cell phone for a replacement?
(taken from SprintPCS's website) Coverage is not available everywhere, nor can we guarantee you will receive coverage at all times, or without interruptions or delays (e.g., dropped calls, blocked calls, etc.) in the coverage areas we identify. Actual coverage and quality of Services may be affected by conditions within or beyond our control, including network problems, software, signal strength, your equipment, structures (including buildings in which you may be located), atmospheric, geographic, or topographic conditions.
They dont claim theyre not a telephone service, but they do say that coverage is NOT available everywhere. I'm not going to quote each and every cell phone carrier, but you get the idea.
Need telephone service quality and stability? Go with a company that says they'll give it to you. |
|
 flyingroach
join:2003-12-04 Brooklyn, NY | reply to dellsweig Voicepulse in 212 was giving me fast busy occasionally at same time. My dsl speed was still 1.5 |
|
  dellsweig Extreme Aerobatics Premium,MVM join:2003-12-10 Campbell Hall, NY | reply to jay_rm Me thinks they are trying to get everything back to where it was before yesterdays fail-over.... |
|
 ro2424
join:2001-12-30 Jersey City, NJ
| reply to The Way Out UUNET is also in the mix.
1 10 ms 10 ms 10 ms x 2 10 ms 10 ms 10 ms x 3 2134 ms * * X 4 * 20 ms 10 ms X ] 5 10 ms 20 ms 10 ms x
6 10 ms 20 ms 10 ms core2.ge2-0-bbnet1.nyc.pnap.net [209.191.X.X]
7 20 ms 10 ms 20 ms POS2-1.GW12.NYC4.ALTER.NET [157.130.50.85] 8 50 ms 10 ms 20 ms 0.so-1-0-0.xl1.nyc4.alter.net [152.63.22.78] 9 70 ms 10 ms 20 ms 0.so-7-0-0.xl1.nyc9.alter.net [152.63.10.22] 10 10 ms 20 ms 20 ms 0.so-7-0-0.xr1.nyc9.alter.net [152.63.23.138] 11 20 ms 20 ms 10 ms 281.atm7-0.xr1.ewr1.alter.net [152.63.17.229] 12 20 ms 10 ms 20 ms 193.atm6-0.gw5.ewr1.alter.net [152.63.20.233] 13 vonage-gw4.customer.alter.net [208.192.180.46] reports: Destination net un eachable.
Additionally my route to one of their preproxies changed from level3 to global crossing.
1 10 ms 10 ms 10 ms x 2 10 ms 10 ms 10 ms x 3 17 ms 16 ms * x 4 * 20 ms 20 x ] 5 20 ms 20 ms 10 ms x 6 100 ms 230 ms 201 ms core7.ge2-1-bbnet2.nyc.pnap.net [209.191.128.168
7 20 ms 20 ms 10 ms ge-2-1-0.ar1.jfk1.gblx.net [64.208.26.125] 8 20 ms 10 ms 20 ms so0-0-0-2488m.ar3.jfk1.gblx.net [67.17.72.30] 9 20 ms 10 ms 20 ms vonage-holdings-corp-edis.t3-3-0-1.ar3.jfk1.gblx net [64.212.34.190] |
|
  RR Conductor RailRoadDude Premium join:2002-04-02 Redwood Valley, CA
·Comcast
1 edit | reply to The Way Out This is why VoIP is a long ways from replacing landlines, even cell phones are more reliable. Isn't their any kind of oversight of these companies like with the bells? Man, if landline service went out often and affected so many like VoIP, you'd have the authorities on them pretty quick.
--
»www.johnkerry.com »205.245.189.161:1100/ ,Live,24Hr cam of 100+ trains a day action on the BNSF RR&Amtrak Mendota subdiv&Galesburg RR Museum ops in Galesburg,IL See the BOOMING railroads of today,and tommorrow- »www.gorail.org/
|
|
 The Way Out
join:2003-01-20
| reply to scooby said by scooby : vonage really should be using multiple isps instead of a single crappy one (WCG - Wiltel). Appears parts of the wcg network is having issues so vonage is down for a majority of the users.
They're multihomed with Level3 and Globalcrossing as well.
traceroute to www.vonage.com (216.115.24.188), 30 hops max, 40 byte packets 1 ge-8-1-218.ipcolo2.SanJose1.Level3.net (63.210.198.225) 0 ms 0 ms 0 ms 2 ge-1-1-0-56.bbr2.SanJose1.Level3.net (64.159.2.161) 0 ms 0 ms 0 ms 3 so-0-0-0.mp1.Weehawken1.Level3.net (64.159.1.66) 87 ms 87 ms 87 ms 4 so-4-0.hsa2.Weehawken1.Level3.net (64.159.3.222) 88 ms 87 ms 88 ms 5 unknown.Level3.net (63.211.89.146) 89 ms !A 89 ms !A *
traceroute to www.vonage.com (216.115.24.188), 30 hops max, 38 byte packets 1 65.39.248.114 (65.39.248.114) 0.211 ms 0.158 ms 0.132 ms 2 sntcca2lce1.wcg.net (198.32.176.139) 0.921 ms 1.314 ms 1.722 ms 3 sntcca1wcx2-pos0-0.wcg.net (64.200.149.13) 68.161 ms 68.068 ms 68.750 ms 4 dnvrco1wcx3-pos14-0.wcg.net (64.200.240.181) 147.468 ms 133.023 ms 220.175 ms 5 dnvrco1wcx3-pos13-0-oc192.wcg.net (64.200.240.122) 69.250 ms 67.987 ms 68.219 ms 6 nycmny2wcx3-pos14-0-oc192.wcg.net (64.200.240.254) 67.975 ms 69.240 ms 68.108 ms 7 dllstx1wcx3-oc12.wcg.net (64.200.240.234) 68.097 ms 68.177 ms 69.146 ms 8 nwrknj1wce1-pos3-0.wcg.net (64.200.68.137) 68.070 ms 67.791 ms 67.908 ms 9 nwrknj1wce1-vonage-2-3.wcg.net (64.200.60.246) 70.709 ms !A * *
traceroute to www.vonage.com (216.115.24.188), 30 hops max, 38 byte packets 1 x (x) 1.524 ms 1.441 ms 1.127 ms 2 d1-2-1-0-2.a00.snfcca02.us.ra.verio.net (207.21.113.137) 8.464 ms 8.476 ms 8.163 ms 3 p4-6-0-0.r00.plalca01.us.bb.verio.net (129.250.16.34) 8.882 ms p4-4-0-0.r00.plalca01. *us.bb.verio.net (129.250.16.32) 10.963 ms p4-6-0-0.r00.plalca01.us.bb.verio.net (129.250. *16.34) 9.502 ms 4 p16-0-1-0.r20.plalca01.us.bb.verio.net (129.250.3.78) 9.859 ms 9.170 ms 10.717 ms 5 so0-0-0-622m.ar2.pao2.gblx.net (208.50.13.97) 10.435 ms 10.604 ms 8.836 ms 6 so1-0-0-2488M.ar3.JFK1.gblx.net (67.17.72.26) 80.272 ms 80.875 ms 82.505 ms 7 Vonage-Holdings-Corp-EDIS.t3-3-0-1.ar3.JFK1.gblx.net (64.212.34.190) 282.680 ms 173. *425 ms 251.889 ms 8 64.157.171.5 (64.157.171.5) 86.148 ms 87.358 ms 83.148 ms
(*) WARNING 2 long line(s) split
|
|