Supafly
Premium
join:2000-07-15
Elk Grove, CA
| Windows XP SP2 *FINAL* Screenshots
winver.exe | 
Internet Explorer | 
Security Center | 
Automatic Updates | 
Control Panel | 
Windows Firewall | 
Windows Firewall (Exceptions) | 
Windows Firewall (Advanced) | 
Outgoing Firewall Protection? |
I slipstreamed in into an older XP cd with SP1a on it, formatted and installed on a clean drive.
These screenshots were taken with windows in it's defaults state. Only thing I did was disable the themes. |
|
Gorden
join:2003-07-16 | can you take a picture of the RTM tags on your desktop? |
|
Steve
I'm a PC, so shut up
Consultant
join:2001-03-10
Yorba Linda, CA
| reply to Supafly
said by Supafly  :
Outgoing firewall protection?
No, it's inbound. said by the dialog box:
Windows firewall has blocked this program from accepting connections from the internet or a network. ...
--
Stephen J. Friedl * Security Consultant * Tustin, California USA * my web site |
|
Supafly
Premium
join:2000-07-15
Elk Grove, CA
1 edit | reply to Gorden
said by Gorden :
can you take a picture of the RTM tags on your desktop?
I forgot how to do that, they're not enabled by default... |
|
CKY
Fuhrer
join:2002-12-12 | reply to Supafly
Microsoft spent $300 million dollars for that??!! 
--
I ♥ Canada |
|
Epyon9283
Premium
join:2001-12-26
Dayton, NJ | reply to Supafly
Why would the final have rtm in the build ver? |
|
Steve
I'm a PC, so shut up
Consultant
join:2001-03-10
Yorba Linda, CA
| said by Epyon9283 :
Why would the final have rtm in the build ver?
All versions of software have a build number.
--
Stephen J. Friedl * Security Consultant * Tustin, California USA * my web site |
|
Epyon9283
Premium
join:2001-12-26
Dayton, NJ
| said by Steve :
said by Epyon9283 :
Why would the final have rtm in the build ver?
All versions of software have a build number.
Yeah I know that... I was just wondering why in the build number in the screen shots theres no mention of 2180. Why would the final release still have rtm in the build number? |
|
Steve
I'm a PC, so shut up
Consultant
join:2001-03-10
Yorba Linda, CA
| I don't know why the build number doesn't show up either, but "RTM" seems like as good a way to say "final version" as any.
Steve
--
Stephen J. Friedl * Security Consultant * Tustin, California USA * my web site |
|
Epyon9283
Premium
join:2001-12-26
Dayton, NJ
| Well I got a version of sp2 from somewhere and the md5 digest matches the one I saw listed in the neowin forums. I'm going to install once kdebase 3.2.3-r1 finishes compiling in Linux.
From what I saw when looking around other forums 2158 is not the final build. I think it should say 2180 but I'll find out. I'm not too concerned if it breaks my windows install. I don't use it for much of anything  |
|
SillyHOmer
@verizon.ne | RTM means ready to manufacture. Thats why dell, gateway, HP, and other venders already selling PC with SP2 installed. |
|
howie
Premium,MVM
join:2003-04-08
Little Falls, NJ
| reply to Supafly
It seems it was released to PC manufacturers today so this may very well be SP2 final.
»www.microsoft.com/presspass/pres···chPR.asp
--
I could be wrong, now... but I don't think so! - Adrian Monk |
|
storm64007
Premium
join:2001-05-21
Freeport, NY | reply to Supafly
It does say 2180 in the IE screenshot. |
|
Epyon9283
Premium
join:2001-12-26
Dayton, NJ | reply to Supafly
Ah. Well I just installed and my build number is the same. I guess it probably is the final. |
|
storm64007
Premium
join:2001-05-21
Freeport, NY
2 edits | said by Epyon9283 :
Ah. Well I just installed and my build number is the same. I guess it probably is the final.
Go into start>accessories>system tools> system information.
Hardware Abstraction Layer should say version..5.1.2600.2180
In IE Help>about should say same build as posted in the IE pic above that supafly posted. |
|
dandelion
Premium,MVM
join:2003-04-29
Germantown, TN
clubs: | reply to Supafly
Noted you had SP1a, is there a link where MS says is also for SP1 (which has MS java and .NET)-couldn't find on MS site.
--
want to know what I'm doing? |
|
howie
Premium,MVM
join:2003-04-08
Little Falls, NJ
| said by dandelion :
Noted you had SP1a, is there a link where MS says is also for SP1 (which has MS java and .NET)-couldn't find on MS site.
I slipstreamed it with XP SP1 and it (XP-SP2) does not install MS Virtual Machine or .NET Framework so you'll need to install your own MS Java and .NET will be available as a Windows Update.
--
I could be wrong, now... but I don't think so! - Adrian Monk |
|
Sparrow
Crystal Sky
Premium
join:2002-12-03
Sachakhand
| I posted this a few days back in anticipation of the MS Java problems: »Re: Is Spyware Doctor 2.1 ok? + hijackthis log
...and when reformatting from an OEM with SP1 as the base: »Re: So will SP2 nuke the system?
--
Security Forum FAQs ..♥.. AV Complaints? ..♥.. Raj karega Khalsa! ..♥.. XP SP2 |
|
Daemon
Premium
join:2003-06-29
San Francisco, CA
 ·Comcast
1 edit | reply to Steve
said by Steve :
I don't know why the build number doesn't show up either, but "RTM" seems like as good a way to say "final version" as any.
Steve
rtm appears in the build string of downloads via windowsbeta. People tell me the final version won't have it |
|
Martinus
Premium
join:2001-08-06
EU | reply to Supafly
OK, but SP2 won't remove MSVM if it's already installed, right? I'd rather keep this outdated VM than installing Sun's Java.
--
From the GSV "Ethics Gradient" |
|
