B
Premium,MVM
join:2000-10-28
| Re: The Original Juice Scam
Yes, fine, I see the point now, but if that's the goal shouldn't you include the dreaded name "JuiceBoosted" or "JuiceBoosted.com" somewhere in the body of the article, rather than merely in a link?
-- B
--
In a realm outside causality and function | |
|
 |
 | 
Doctor Four
My other vehicle is a TARDIS
Premium
join:2000-09-05
Dallas, TX | Re: The Original Juice Scam And the third link in Google points back to BBR's original
article on the juiceboosted scam. But less net savvy
surfers are probably going to buy this one thinking its
for real. | |
|
| B
Premium,MVM
join:2000-10-28
| said by Karl Bode  :
Just "juice" and "scam" should be enough.
»www.google.com/search?hl=en&ie=U···ice+scam
Actually, Karl, you're proving my point. First, nobody who's checking it out will immediately think to use the search term "scam" -- rather they'll just type the product name.
Further, Google lists your older article highly for »www.google.com/search?hl=en&lr=&···G=Search precisely because you usd "boost" in the text. Note how DSLR does NOT show up on the first page of Google hits fr "juice boostED" at »www.google.com/search?hl=en&lr=&···G=Search
So my humble suggestion (to incorporate at least "boost" in the text) still stands.
-- B
--
In a realm outside causality and function | |
|
| | 
Karl Bode
News Guy
join:2000-03-02 | Re: The Original Juice Scam Actually, I would type "scam" and "Juice" if I was interested in seeing if Juice was a scam, but I see your point and will add boost to the subtitle.... | |
|
| | | joebear29
join:2003-07-20
Alabaster, AL | Re: The Original Juice Scam I also am in the habit of googling the name of something followed by scam when checking something out. I'm sure others do as well. | |
|
|
|
|
