Search:  

 
 
   All ForumsHot TopicsGallery






how-to block ads


 
Forums » Time Warner Cries Foul » Poor Babies
Search Topic:
Share Topic:
RSS topic:
toggle:
flat / full
normal / watch
Post a:
Post a:
AuthorAll Replies


rolande
Certifiable
Premium,Mod
join:2002-05-24
Powell, OH
clubs:

Host:
Linksys
AT&T Midwest
reply to ruscorp
Re: Poor Babies

said by ruscorp See Profile:
It's all shared at some point.

That IS the general idea of how networks operate. But, for those of you who are protocol challenged, a protocol like CMTS that is shared at layer 2 without any deterministic qualities like a TDM network makes a whole connection act like garbage when enough other stations on the segment are busy. Most DSL providers on the other hand are typically using ATM at layer 2 with either PPPoA or PPPoE for the client connectivity. This provides a whole different class of connection quality that is scalable and fully manageable by the providers. Cable providers don't have that flexibility on their networks and have little ability to control the congestion in their networks at the edge except to enforce harsh ToS agreements to limit upstream traffic. DSL's downfall is usually the physical limitations of the wire to the customer's premises. Luckily for the cable companies this is something they don't have to worry about. Everyone can connect just the same. They just have to try and control upstream bandwidth usage without a technical way to do it with the access protocol to avoid upstream congestion within their nodes.

Shared interfaces at aggregation points like 100Meg or Gig or OC-3, OC-12, OC-48 etc. are a complete world apart from the shared technology behind the DOCSIS standard. You are trying to compare shared service within an access technology versus shared service within a core network technology. So you can't even begin to compare these apples and oranges. Obviously speed of those technologies is a factor. But, aside from the speeds, the methods of traffic queueing that can occur on those types of interfaces, depending on the layer 2 protocol, is like comparing a Ferrari to a Pinto. When you aggregate thousands of broadband connections into upstream network connections that are shared in this manner, that is whole different kind of shared connection than cable uses.
--
Ignorance is temporary...stupidity lasts forever!


3SGTE
ST215W
Premium,MVM
join:2000-11-23
there
clubs:

Yes, that is the technical way of looking at things.

I look at the speed test archive here at dslr:
»/archive

Judge for yourself.
Theory vs execution!

(As was said earlier, either DSL or Cable can be done well, or done poorly.)
--
»www.fiberal.ca/ We need Arnie!
Forums » Time Warner Cries Foul


Monday, 23-Nov 10:37:58 Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Hosting by www.nac.net - DSL,Hosting & Co-lo | feedback | contact
over 10 years online! © 1999-2009 dslreports.com.republican-creole
page compression OFF
Most commented news this week
· [13] Frontier Increases Modem Rental Fee
· [5] Earthlink Suffers From Major E-mail Outage
· [4] Vivendi In Way Of Comcast's NBC Desires
· [1] Monday Morning Links
Most people now reading
· Extra charge to use Master Card instead of Visa? [General Questions]
· Best Bluray player [General Questions]
· Facebook Cures Depression [Canadian Chat]
· Windows 7 boot manager editing questions [Microsoft Help]
· Smoker's Applecare warranties may not be worth anything [All Things Macintosh]
· Sealing air ducts [Home Repair & Improvement]
· Slow speeds in the evenings [TekSavvy]
· 3.x Feral Druid - Bear Tanking Guide [World of Warcraft]
· [Free] Opera 10.10 Final [Software]