Search:  

 
 
   All ForumsHot TopicsGallery






how-to block ads


 
Forums » Optimum Port Blocking » Any restriction is a service downgrade
Search Topic:
Uniqs:
314
Share Topic:
RSS topic:
toggle:
flat / full
normal / watch
Post a:
Post a:
VPN no longer working, Laptop woes on the road »
AuthorAll Replies

budke

join:2003-07-22
Rye, NY

reply to Shady Bimmer
Re: Any restriction is a service downgrade

That's nice, but OOL doesn't offer static IPs (yet, but don't rule in out in the infinite future acording to them). They also do other filtering other than port 25 (inbound 53 for one, and the general inability to do srcprt 53 work. I'm sure there are others, but $40 more a month for the ability to send mail out on 25 and run a backup server on 25 on optonline isn't worth the price.

Shady Bimmer
Premium
join:2001-12-03
Northport, NY
clubs:
·Verizon FIOS
·Optimum Online

reply to wolfox
said by wolfox See Profile:
If anything, it would cost $LESS$. Think about it - without having to monitor, wave a big stick over your Internet experience, etc. Just leaving you alone does not cost any more dough...

Except for one gaping hole - what would stop a spammer/abuser from spending an extra few bucks and continue their abuse? If it were really that easy OOL could lower their costs for a higher net profit.

Business service is OOL's answer. No it is not cheap, but it provides a static IP that the subscriber can't change making it very easy to identify, track, and ultimately prevent abusers. Unfortunately providing the level of service BOOL offers incurrs additional costs, resulting in a higher subscription rate.


nixen
Rockin' the Boxen
Premium
join:2002-10-04
Alexandria, VA
·Cox HSI
·Speakeasy

reply to kpatz
said by kpatz See Profile:
said by reub2000 See Profile:
They can switch to DSL. I know speakeasy advertises that they don't block ports.

Not everyone can get DSL, or Speakeasy. I for one would love to see cable and DSL providers offer a "Power User" tier that allows servers (at least to an extent) and no port blocking, at maybe $5-10 higher than the standard residential service. Then those of us who want or need to use email servers other than the ISP's have a choice.

Many cable and DSL services already do offer such services. They just generally fall under the business or SOHO product names.

-tom
--
"There are 10 types of people in the world... those who understand binary and those who don't."
"That's only 2 types of people, moron"


nixen
Rockin' the Boxen
Premium
join:2002-10-04
Alexandria, VA
·Cox HSI
·Speakeasy

reply to wolfox
said by wolfox See Profile:
If anything, it would cost $LESS$. Think about it - without having to monitor, wave a big stick over your Internet experience, etc. Just leaving you alone does not cost any more dough...

Pushing a new rule to your routers and firewalls isn't exactly super expensive. And, it's not like it's a recurring cost. It's definitely a lower cost than responding to complaints about unblocked compromised systems.

-tom
--
"There are 10 types of people in the world... those who understand binary and those who don't."
"That's only 2 types of people, moron"


nixen
Rockin' the Boxen
Premium
join:2002-10-04
Alexandria, VA
·Cox HSI
·Speakeasy

reply to jaa
said by jaa See Profile:
I just don't see why this is an issue. The problem is that port 25 has 2 uses: mail server to server transfer, and mail client to server transfer. Should have been using two different ports from the beginning.
SMTP is much older than any of the client mail protocols (e.g. POP). So, there was never any call for a "client" port in the original specification. SPAM was a fairly non-existent problem when POP was first created, so there still wasn't a compelling reason to add a client-specific port for SMTP trafficing.

-tom
--
"There are 10 types of people in the world... those who understand binary and those who don't."
"That's only 2 types of people, moron"


wolfox
Gentle Wolfox

join:2002-11-27
Dunnellon, FL

reply to kpatz
If anything, it would cost $LESS$. Think about it - without having to monitor, wave a big stick over your Internet experience, etc. Just leaving you alone does not cost any more dough...
--
Nothwest Arkansas' ONLY all Techno Radio Webcast, powered by SBC DSL!

kpatz
MY HEAD A SPLODE
Premium
join:2003-06-13
Manchester, NH

reply to reub2000
said by reub2000 See Profile:
They can switch to DSL. I know speakeasy advertises that they don't block ports.

Not everyone can get DSL, or Speakeasy. I for one would love to see cable and DSL providers offer a "Power User" tier that allows servers (at least to an extent) and no port blocking, at maybe $5-10 higher than the standard residential service. Then those of us who want or need to use email servers other than the ISP's have a choice.
--
Robert Tappan Morris, Jr., got six months in jail for crashing 10% of the computers that Bill Gates made $100 million crashing last weekend.


reub2000
Premium
join:2001-12-28
Evanston, IL
reply to jaa
They can switch to DSL. I know speakeasy advertises that they don't block ports.


jaa
Premium,MVM
join:2000-06-13
·Optimum Online
·Vonage

reply to Plasticman
They do not need to upgrade to SOHO. They can just use an alternate port. My hosting company provides and alternate port. 1and1 provides an alternate port.

I just don't see why this is an issue. The problem is that port 25 has 2 uses: mail server to server transfer, and mail client to server transfer. Should have been using two different ports from the beginning.
--
NOTHING justifies terrorism. We don't negotiate with terrorists. Those that support terrorists are terrorists.


Plasticman
Will Work For Bandwidth
Premium
join:2002-09-06
Harrisville, RI
clubs:
reply to jaa
Well if they want to have access to port 25. Then they should see about upgrading to a SOHO account.......

Plasticman


jaa
Premium,MVM
join:2000-06-13
·Optimum Online
·Vonage

Any additional restriction a provider places on a service is a downgrade. The only question is how important that downgrade is to a particular subscriber.

Inbound port 25 blocking only affects users running their own mail servers - which OOL already prohibits.

Outbound port 25 blocking only affects those who use an external smtp server, which is probably a small percentage. Of those, most can either switch to use the OOL smtp server, or use an alternate port for their mail server.

Those who are most affected may leave for another service. Unfortunately, they may have a hard time finding a provider who does not block port 25, or worse, switch to another provider just to find they start blocking port 25.
--
NOTHING justifies terrorism. We don't negotiate with terrorists. Those that support terrorists are terrorists.
Forums » Optimum Port BlockingVPN no longer working, Laptop woes on the road »


Sunday, 29-Nov 14:14:13 Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Hosting by www.nac.net - DSL,Hosting & Co-lo | feedback | contact
over 10 years online! © 1999-2009 dslreports.com.republican-creole
page compression OFF
Most commented news this week
· [124] Time Warner Cable Fires Broadside At Broadcasters
· [112] New AT&T Ad Campaign Hits Back At Verizon
· [96] Apple Joins AT&T Verizon Snark Fest
· [87] New Bill Takes Aim At Higher Verizon ETFs
· [80] TiVo Sees Record Customer Losses
· [77] Weekend Open Thread
· [76] Verizon CEO: Hulu Will Be Dead Soon
· [69] In-Flight Internet Headed For Bumpy Landing?
· [62] Thanksgiving Open Thread
· [40] EFF Wages War On Fine Print
Most people now reading
· Is Easynews down? [Filesharing Software]
· Are GPS's better today? [General Questions]
· Windows 7 boot manager editing questions [Microsoft Help]
· Samsung LCD TV No Picture but has Sound [Electronics]
· [NFL] Week 12 Games Thread [Sports Chat]
· 3.x Feral Druid - Bear Tanking Guide [World of Warcraft]
· Grey Cup on the Web? [Canadian Chat]
· Evading throttling with uTP / uTorrent 1.9a [TekSavvy]
· [Newsgroups] Newzleech down? [Filesharing Software]
· [Snow Leopard] NFS Mounts - no more Directory Utility [All Things Macintosh]