JJ
Beat It, Bill
Premium,MVM
join:2000-02-18
Madison, WI
| reply to hailinfantry
Re: They're already making "a bit" of money ...
Okay, a bit more money then 
Some people want the "ultimate in features" but don't want an HD-based player because they don't own gigabytes worth of music, or they want to use the player during high-impact exercise. Flash-based doesn't necessarily imply disposable. |
|
hailinfantry
Bizarro Quinn
Premium
join:2004-01-18
Brooklyn, NY
| said by JJ  :Okay, a bit more money then Some people want the "ultimate in features" but don't want an HD-based player because they don't own gigabytes worth of music, or they want to use the player during high-impact exercise. Flash-based doesn't necessarily imply disposable. Some people aren't cut out for Apple products, either.
That's a very simple and obvious fact.
--
Leon: No, I forget sometimes.. you see, my old manager at the Orange Julius is named Doug, and, uh.. anyway, I think I should tell you, the.. uh.. computer you're looking at is for gays.Customer: What?! |
|
joetaxpayer
I'M Here Till Thursday
join:2001-09-07
Wayland, MA
 ·Comcast Formerly ..
| said by hailinfantry : Some people aren't cut out for Apple products, either. That's a very simple and obvious fact. Not sure what you're implying. Do you feel that flash-based is somehow inferior? Or is it that since flash will likely mean a lower end (in terms of capacity) that there's something wrong with that? How is this advance anything less than a quality Apple product? (and would your view change if flash technology suddenly took a leap to where 50GB cost Apple pennies to put in the iPod and lose the HD?)
JOE |
|
