Search:  

 
 
   All ForumsHot TopicsGallery






how-to block ads


 
Forums » MPAA Begins to Sue » Here we go
Search Topic:
Share Topic:
RSS topic:
toggle:
flat / full
normal / watch
Post a:
Post a:
Well... »
« Oh well  
AuthorAll Replies


treetop1000

join:2003-11-07
Lexington, KY

reply to StudioTech
Re: Here we go

Nah. We all know how this goes. Lawyers hired by Fat-cat studio executives put on their jackboots, grab the whips and chains, and commence to goose-stepping all over a mob of small children, teenagers, and young ignorant college- age students.
I see NO reason to imprison or punish people over "illegal possession of copyrighted material"
Books are copyrighted aren't they? How come Doubleday is not doing the same thing to those of us who read and copy text illegally?


Trakker
Danger
Premium
join:2003-01-12
ß
This kind of BS just kills me. So if you do something illegal like pirating, when the copyright is enforced somehow that jack booted?

Please you really can be this stupid, can you?


Yowzaaah
Ours Go To Eleven

join:2000-12-14
DamnFlat, OH
clubs:
I think we can ALL agree that.....

when worn by the right woman and in combination with a riding crop, JACK BOOTS ARE DAMN SEXY!

ooops...wrong forum.:p


Jason Levine
Premium
join:2001-07-13
USA

reply to treetop1000
Re: Here we go

said by treetop1000 See Profile:

I see NO reason to imprison or punish people over "illegal possession of copyrighted material"
Actually, it's not possession that they are prosecuting (except maybe as a side issue). It's illegal distribution of copyrighted materials. If I download a copy of "Spiderman 2" via a P2P network, I'm doing something illegal, but it's hard to track me and not very cost-effective to prosecute me. If, however, I'm sharing a copy of "Spiderman 2" (along with 1,000+ other titles) on a P2P network, it is very easy to spot me and easy to prosecute me.

I do think that the RIAA has abused their ability to prosecute the uploaders (by forcing them into one-sided settlements and not allowing them real due process which might weed out mistakes), and I think that the penalties are too severe, but in general I agree with their approach. If you don't want to get sued, don't distribute material that you don't have the right to distribute.
--
-Jason Levine
http://www.jasons-toolbox.com/
http://www.PCQandA.com/
http://www.urateit.com/
Forums » MPAA Begins to SueWell... »
« Oh well  


Thursday, 03-Dec 02:59:51 Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Hosting by www.nac.net - DSL,Hosting & Co-lo | feedback | contact
over 10 years online! © 1999-2009 dslreports.com.
page compression OFF
Most commented news this week
· [162] Comcast Releasing Promised Usage Meter
· [96] Graduate Student Unveils Sprint's GPS Sharing With Feds
· [79] Latest Consumer Reports Survey Not Kind To AT&T
· [70] Baltimore To Ban Lazy Cable Installs
· [64] Avast Antivirus Has Gone Mad
· [62] Broadband Killed The Game Console
· [55] Rogers Unveils The ISP Dream Model
· [46] ACTA: Global Three Strikes
· [41] Rural Carriers Quickly Embracing Fiber
· [40] AT&T, Verizon Drop 3G Ad Dispute
Most people now reading
· False positive in Avast! or is it real? [Security]
· Windows 7 boot manager editing questions [Microsoft Help]
· [WIN7] Outlook express under Windows 7? [Microsoft Help]
· ToC 4th boss - Preliminary Strategy for Twin Valkyr [World of Warcraft]
· Quality/longevity of 15A 120V receptacles [Home Repair & Improvement]
· Linksys Gateway Mode vs Router Mode [Linksys]
· [Phish] email from CDC "personal vaccination profile" [Spam, Scam and Phishbusters]
· Opening a file download dialog from a JavaScript function. [Webmasters and Developers]
· [Newsgroups] Newzleech down? [Filesharing Software]