gamer999
join:2004-10-27
Richardson, TX
| reply to mglunt
Re: Go away
yeah a heck of al lot slower ... you ask why would people want
to spend the extra mon, well ill put it in lamens terms if we were to both start making breakfast with all the trimmings at the same time, i would be done finished and watching the game and you... well would be cracking that first egg! |
|
sallyweltrop
@cox.net |  reply to jarablue
I've received 4 AOL discs in the mail this past month and ALL of them went immediately into the trash. How stupid is this company. People want speed! Bombarding & irritating people with drink coasters is NOT a good business plan. |
|
Hayward
K A R - 1 2 0 C
Premium
join:2000-07-13
Key West, FL
| reply to isecondthatnominatio
said by isecondthatnominatio:
the facts prove this beause no further innovations have come from this company.
Any ever did????? Lets see the bought and killed Netscape, the use the IE engine, OK started AIM but made it not necessary to be an AOL subscriber, so so what. (And weren't really far ahead of anyone else... IRC had been around for a decade or more)
Really, what real innovation except making the Internet mindless accessible at excessive prices and a place for the unfettered distribution of viruses, trojans, and worms?
--
»haywardm.com (Hayward's Key West) |
|
flushls
join:2004-11-02
Joyce, WA | reply to tcope
Hey don't forget QWEST they are as FUBAR as AOL, Enron Etc. |
|
Vchat20
Landing is the REAL challenge
join:2003-09-16
Warren, OH
clubs:  | reply to mglunt
i know you were being sarcastic, but note that there are a few BB providers out there who have $15 and $20 "lite" plans which are still much faster than dialup. |
|
technick
Premium
join:2000-12-16
Loganville, GA | reply to Ap0calypse
what's wrong with sugar ray? |
|
tcope
Premium
join:2003-05-07
Sandy, UT
 ·Comcast
| reply to jarablue
AOLS business model:
Let's flood the market with advertizing but don't actually offer anything new (we will just take the old stuff and add more bloated advertizing to it) and then charge more then anyone else in the market. Surly this will keep us going for decades. How can it fail? Oh... and we won't lift a finger about all the negative feedback this plan causes.
Just another example of Enron and Tyco like CEO's running the ship. They got their million dollar paychecks. But hey, what do I know. |
|
mglunt
join:2001-09-10
Fredericksburg, VA | reply to jarablue
I don't get it. Why don't people want to spend $25 on dial up. It sure beats spending $30 on broadband! We're $5 cheaper! Just look at the savings! |
|
Ap0calypse
join:2003-12-19
Burlington, ON | reply to jarablue
Get rid of this Dinosaur already. Anyone that pays extra for AOL email and Sugar Ray content should not have the right to own a computer anyway... |
|
isecondthatnominatio
@optonline.net
| reply to jarablue
Hmm, In the popular opinion of many, Like Arafat. AOL is irrelevant, despite what Time Warner wants everyone to believe and the facts prove this beause no further innovations have come from this company... in what like months, and months, maybe a few free songs here and there, but real value. No.. dump Time Warner Stock, this puppy is going downhill from here! |
|
jarablue
Always be true to yourself
join:2001-06-11
Worcester, MA | AOL just go away. First post! |
|
