Search:  

 
 
   All ForumsHot TopicsGallery






how-to block ads


 
Forums » Up and Running » Security » Security » Norton AV 2003 vs Norton AV 2005?
Search Topic:
Uniqs:
687
Share Topic:
RSS topic:
toggle:
flat / full
normal / watch
Posting:
Post a:
Post a:
Giant Tracks Eraser »
« News: Major Exploit Underway...  
AuthorAll Replies


jsts

@cable.rogers

Norton AV 2003 vs Norton AV 2005?

Hi wondering if anyone can give me some advice here.

I have been using NAV 2003 for a while, and it has worked fine. Last year I tried out NAV 2004 but it was a mess: made browsing the net slow to a crawl among other things - so I ended up going back to NAV 2003. So now here I am once again. Is there any significant change in terms of protection accorded by NAV 2005? Can I just continue with 2003? Any advice would greatly be appreciated.


Buddel
If it ain't broke, don't fix it.
Premium
join:2004-03-06
EU
I don't use NAV myself, so I cannot really help you. However, I found a thread that may be of interest to you:
»Anyone Upgrade NAV 2003 to 2005?


jsts

@cable.rogers
 reply to jsts
That thread didn't really help unfortunately. Basically just wondering if I would be doing myself a diservice by continuing to use 2003. 2004 didn't work for me and I am reluctant to try 2005 if I don't need to. Any comments would be appreciated.


Dr Tweak

join:2004-09-23
Chesapeake, VA

reply to jsts
jsts do yourself a favor and try another AV product (not trying to bash Norton) there are MANY other products far superior to Norton for less money. I would suggest looking into Kaspersky or even F-Secure (personally I would recommend Kaspersky).



sivran
God Save The Suite
Premium
join:2003-09-15
Arlington, TX
clubs:
·RoadRunner Cable

reply to jsts
I'll second kavuser's sentiments. I've developed quite the dislike of Norton recently. However...

quote:
2004 didn't work for me and I am reluctant to try 2005 if I don't need to.
You DO need to, IF you want to stick with Norton products. I'm sorry to say, NAV 2003 is woefully inadequate against today's malware, and even in some cases yesterday's. The reason for this is 2003 does not have the unpackers (note: I am not referring to archives like zip and rar here, though NAV 2003 is lacking in that area too, it can't scan in RARs) that the newer versions do. It may have the definitions for virus x and virus y, but if they're "packed" with certain methods now commonly used, NAV 2003 will not detect them.

If you feel the need to be well protected (and hey, how many of us don't feel that need?) you should go out and buy a new AV product. The free ones quite frankly don't cut it. If you had problems with NAV 2004 you should consider making the switch to some other vendor's offering. Note also that some other vendors, such as McAfee, provide not only signature updates but engine updates, meaning you don't have to buy a new version every year like with Norton, which doesn't provide such updates.
--
TCPA - Treacherous Computing
Kerio 2.1.5 - Best damn firewall
Licenses should be per user, Ditch Norton! Get F-Prot!


Buddel
If it ain't broke, don't fix it.
Premium
join:2004-03-06
EU

reply to Dr Tweak
said by Dr Tweak See Profile:

jsts do yourself a favor and try another AV product (not trying to bash Norton) there are MANY other products far superior to Norton for less money. I would suggest looking into Kaspersky or even F-Secure (personally I would recommend Kaspersky).


That's what I did a long time ago. I also decided to look into Kaspersky and I realized that this is the AV I had been looking for. I have never looked back. If you decide to buy another AV, please make sure to get rid of NAV completely. Those switching from NAV to KAV often say their new AV doesn't run properly due to NAV files and registry keys that are left on their systems. Anyway, I'm not trying to bash NAV either, but I agree with Dr Tweak See Profile: there are better products you can get for less money.


DonnaB
Premium
join:2003-05-07
Macau

reply to jsts
Not sure of your system config but it works like a charm on mine.

Suggestion: If your virus definitions is still valid. Keep what you got. If it is expiring (say in a week..) and you want NAV again, go for NAV 2005 which has new features but you must disable Worm Protection if you are using another firewall program.

I think you should first install the trial version before purchasing. If it will not play nice, you can go back to NAV 2003 and renew the subscription or use another AV.
--
Microsoft MVP-Windows Security - »www.microsoft.com/technet/securi···ult.mspx
Member of ASAP - »www.a-sap.org
Calendar of Updates - »cou.dozleng.com


takeavacation

reply to jsts
One thing about NAV that I like is once you have bought it, you can upgrade to a new version for between $10. and free (if you registered it) if you just wait till the end of the year, when you'll see it on sale at places like BestBuy and CompUSA.
Forums » Up and Running » Security » SecurityGiant Tracks Eraser »
« News: Major Exploit Underway...  


Friday, 21-Nov 03:20:55 Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Hosting by www.nac.net - DSL,Hosting & Co-lo | feedback | contact
over 9 years online! © 1999-2008 dslreports.com.
page compression OFF
Most commented news this week
· [198] Obama FCC Selection Team Won't Make AT&T Happy
· [102] DSL's Not Dead Yet
· [79] Zone Alarm Pro Free Just For Today
· [78] Harvard Law Professor Sues RIAA
· [67] New Xbox 360 'Experience' Goes Live
· [66] CRTC Rules Against Indie ISPs In Throttling Dispute
· [51] Cable Grabbing 71% Of New Broadband Customers
· [49] Storm Reviews Come Rolling In
· [48] Comcast DOCSIS 3.0 Hits Pacific Northwest In December
· [44] Comcast Offers 'Bare Bones' 768kbps VoIP Double Play
Most people now reading
· CRTC ruling coming Thursday Nov 20 [TekSavvy]
· Rocky - time to offer VPN service to all your customers [TekSavvy]
· Extjs grid combo box. [Webmasters and Developers]
· Official news from TekSavvy regarding the CRTC descision [TekSavvy]
· [General] SBC SSL requirements [AT&T West]
· [11224 Boost] Upstream updated to 5.120 MSym/Sec [OptimumOnline]
· Dumping Bell Home Phone Because Of CRTC ruling [TekSavvy]
· Pentagon Hit by Unprecedented Cyber Attack [Security]
· CRTC ruling : 30 day notice and MLPPP? [TekSavvy]
· Appliance repair bill question. [Home Repair & Improvement]