republican-creole
Search:  

 
 
   All ForumsHot TopicsGallery






how-to block ads


 
Forums » Ultra-Wideband » Is it real ?
Search Topic:
Uniqs:
106
Share Topic:
RSS topic:
toggle:
flat / full
normal / watch
Post a:
Post a:
That might be enough to get me to switch to cable »
« how short...  
AuthorAll Replies


XBL2009
------

join:2001-01-03
Chicago, IL

1 edit
Is it real ?

This could change broadband in the United States if this is for real and the cable companies are willing to serve it up.


rustednuggs

join:2002-01-07
Indianapolis, IN
What about broadband over powerlines? It is faster right?


MarkyD
Premium
join:2002-08-20
Oklahoma City, OK
clubs:
·Cox HSI

said by rustednuggs See Profile:

What about broadband over powerlines? It is faster right?
Noo. It's actually quite slow compared to even standard DSL.
(at least the trials that have been going on...)
Broadband over Power lines is going nowhere fast...


en102
Canadian, eh?

join:2001-01-26
Valencia, CA
reply to XBL2009
Most likely will be watered down to 100 Mbps anyways, as 1Gbps is the speed for the node, not each user.


AthlGrond
Premium,MVM
join:2002-04-25
Aurora, CO
·Comcast

said by en102 See Profile:

Most likely will be watered down to 100 Mbps anyways...
Or lower. This may just be a great way for them to save money, rather than improve service. (They may choose to improve service if there is some competition forcing them to...)
--
"I drank what?" -Socrates


Corvus
Flaming Tards Since 2003
Premium,VIP
join:2003-11-26

reply to en102
said by en102 See Profile:

Most likely will be watered down to 100 Mbps anyways, as 1Gbps is the speed for the node, not each user.
1Gbps per node? Must be an error somewhere because even Docsis 1.0 has 5Gps downstream per node. Docsis 3.x (still early stages) should be able to provide 6.3Gbps downstream per node and 200Mbps per channel.
--
Jesus saves, but only Buddha makes incremental backups.

RayW
Premium
join:2001-09-01
Layton, UT
clubs:
·XMission

reply to rustednuggs
said by rustednuggs See Profile:

What about broadband over powerlines? It is faster right?
Power lines are designed for 60 Hz signals, not 1,000,000,000 Hz signals. Add in the fact that UWB can take up to 250,000,000 to 500,000,000 Hz of spectrum, you get all sorts of losses and smearing that are in the realm of third or fourth year engineering or physics and require a bit more math than A+B=C. Add in the fact that we are talking pulses (very high frequency harmonics to keep it clean), you fast reach the point of no signal at all on a power line. Plus it is a low power radiated standard, not a transmission line standard.

This will be more for your home wireless LAN replacement.
--
I am not lost, I find myself every time.
Forums » Ultra-WidebandThat might be enough to get me to switch to cable »
« how short...  


Monday, 30-Nov 15:36:27 Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Hosting by www.nac.net - DSL,Hosting & Co-lo | feedback | contact
over 10 years online! © 1999-2009 dslreports.com.
page compression OFF
Most commented news this week
· [28] Broadband Killed The Game Console
· [24] AT&T Top Lobbyist Cicconi Has His Feelings Hurt
· [18] Midcontinent Socked With Easement Lawsuit
· [18] Rural Carriers Quickly Embracing Fiber
· [10] Charter Exits Chapter 11
· [3] Monday Morning Links
Most people now reading
· Is Microsoft Technet ok to use for my family PC's? [Microsoft Help]
· filling an in-ground pool [Home Repair & Improvement]
· Wind getting a little more aggressive [TekSavvy]
· Are GPS's better today? [General Questions]
· Portable power for blackouts? [Home Repair & Improvement]
· Fun screwing with PuG raids. [World of Warcraft]
· Insulating a attic hatch? [Home Repair & Improvement]
· Options if ACTA is ratified [TekSavvy]
· [Internet] Gaming problem for "Heroes of Newerth" ( New bell Upd [Bell Canada]
· My first attempt at leading a pug. Advice? [World of Warcraft]