republican-creole
Search:  

 
 
   All ForumsHot TopicsGallery






how-to block ads


 
Forums » Spam Vigilantism » whatever it takes
Search Topic:
Share Topic:
RSS topic:
toggle:
flat / full
normal / watch
Post a:
Post a:
The Idea »
« uh oh  
AuthorAll Replies


Jason Levine
Premium
join:2001-07-13
USA
reply to Nerdtalker
Re: whatever it takes

You are also taking out every website that is on the same network segment. Just because I happen to live next door to a spammer, is it appropriate to bomb my driveway as well?


Nerdtalker
Working Hard, Or Hardly Working?
Premium,MVM
join:2003-02-18
Tucson, AZ
clubs:

said by Jason Levine See Profile:

You are also taking out every website that is on the same network segment. Just because I happen to live next door to a spammer, is it appropriate to bomb my driveway as well?
You've let them remain there, and you'd be part of the problem.

If you're not against spam, you're for it.

Either way, the spammers don't even deserve your defense.
--
Touch a thistle timidly, and it pricks you; grasp it boldly, and its spines crumble. -William S. Halsey

Kazaa Is Spyware. Gator / Claria Is Spyware.


I'm testing Gmail's spam filters: Broadbandreports1@gmail.com
Spam: 1186


Jason Levine
Premium
join:2001-07-13
USA

said by Nerdtalker See Profile:

You've let them remain there, and you'd be part of the problem.
I haven't let them remain there. My ISP may have or they may just not know that they are there just yet or they may be going through their process to warn the spammer before booting them. In any case, I, as a website operator, don't know what my network segment neighbors are doing and I really don't have time to worry about that.

said by Nerdtalker See Profile:

If you're not against spam, you're for it.
I'm definitely against spam, but I'm also against using a sledgehammer to swat a fly. DDoSing spammers just generates more network traffic and is illegal in and of itself. Bayesian filters are effective at weeding out spam without generating more network traffic. And education will help keep people from buying from spam. (Which cuts spammers' profits which makes it harder to make a living from spamming.)

said by Nerdtalker See Profile:

Either way, the spammers don't even deserve your defense.
No, but the sites that you take out as collateral damage do. They aren't supporting spam, they just happen to live next door to a spammer. If one of my neighbors on my block were to have been found guilty of fraud, should I be sent to jail too? Do I somehow bear some responsibility for the fraud that my neighbor committed even if I had never talked to him/her and didn't know what they were doing?
--
-Jason Levine
http://www.jasons-toolbox.com/
http://www.PCQandA.com/
http://www.urateit.com/
Forums » Spam VigilantismThe Idea »
« uh oh  


Monday, 09-Nov 11:42:44 Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Hosting by www.nac.net - DSL,Hosting & Co-lo | feedback | contact
over 10 years online! © 1999-2009 dslreports.com.
page compression OFF
Most commented news this week
· [34] VoIP Over 3G Still Not Working For iPhone
· [16] Bill Would Force ISPs To Block Financial Scams
· [7] Clearwire To Get Another $1.5 Billion
· [4] Mediacom Hints At 50, 100 Mbps Speeds
· [2] 15 States Have Now Gotten Broadband Mapping Money
Most people now reading
· Divorce advice... [General Questions]
· 60 Minutes piece on cyber security last night [Security]
· 3.x Feral Druid - Bear Tanking Guide [World of Warcraft]
· My cat is reluctant to exercise. [General Questions]
· [Rant] Brand New 'Jasper' Xbox360 - RRoD Hardware Failure [Rants, Raves, and Praise]
· Framed for child porn 151; by a PC virus [Security]
· Windows 7 boot manager editing questions [Microsoft Help]
· [WIN7] Which Services in Win 7 Have You Turned Off? [Microsoft Help]
· plastic box vs. metal box (electrical) [Home Repair & Improvement]
· Is Gear Score now the new requirement to get pug invite? [World of Warcraft]