Jason Levine
Premium
join:2001-07-13
USA
| reply to Nerdtalker
Re: whatever it takes
said by Nerdtalker  :You've let them remain there, and you'd be part of the problem. I haven't let them remain there. My ISP may have or they may just not know that they are there just yet or they may be going through their process to warn the spammer before booting them. In any case, I, as a website operator, don't know what my network segment neighbors are doing and I really don't have time to worry about that.
said by Nerdtalker :If you're not against spam, you're for it. I'm definitely against spam, but I'm also against using a sledgehammer to swat a fly. DDoSing spammers just generates more network traffic and is illegal in and of itself. Bayesian filters are effective at weeding out spam without generating more network traffic. And education will help keep people from buying from spam. (Which cuts spammers' profits which makes it harder to make a living from spamming.)
said by Nerdtalker :Either way, the spammers don't even deserve your defense. No, but the sites that you take out as collateral damage do. They aren't supporting spam, they just happen to live next door to a spammer. If one of my neighbors on my block were to have been found guilty of fraud, should I be sent to jail too? Do I somehow bear some responsibility for the fraud that my neighbor committed even if I had never talked to him/her and didn't know what they were doing?
--
-Jason Levine
http://www.jasons-toolbox.com/
http://www.PCQandA.com/
http://www.urateit.com/ |
