Search:  

 
 
   All ForumsHot TopicsGallery






how-to block ads


 
Forums » MD Spam Law 'Unconstitutional' » not a suprise
Search Topic:
Share Topic:
RSS topic:
toggle:
flat / full
normal / watch
Post a:
Post a:
« no clue  
AuthorAll Replies


moseley
Premium
join:2001-05-05
Lemoyne, PA
clubs:

reply to Transmaster
Re: not a suprise

As a nation, we have become a little too cavalier about our rights. Giving up rights to stop spam is wrong. Then States could tax inter-state commerce, tax internet purchases, tax email usage an a slew of other things.

Spam costs companies tons of money. What could be done under current laws is a class action law suit. If the risk of sending spam goes up it is no longer a cost effective way to advertise.

Current fraud laws could be used. New federal laws could be used. Using the postal Service to commit fraud is crime why not email.
--
Rock Chalk

Anon00
Premium
join:2001-09-25
USA

said by moseley See Profile:

Current fraud laws could be used. New federal laws could be used. Using the postal Service to commit fraud is crime why not email.
Though getting junk mail isn't a crime so...

And there are laws to protect against out-right fraud, though not civil liability to the person receiving the e-mail, the system is just not equipped to dealing with the massive load that the Internet and E-mail brings. And yes, this is clearly an issue that the Federal government must act on and it is not up to the States to regulate commerce outside their borders but they happy to try to stop the conduct from occurring within their State, and as I understand it, it has been upheld that they can.

What will really stop spam is if stupid people receiving this crap will stop buying from them. I mean honestly, if no one signed up with AOL would they still send you 4 CDs a month in the mail?
--
"Ah, women. They make the highs higher and the lows more frequent." - Friedrich Nietzsche "'It's the law' is just an excuse for the unintelligent to remain that way" - Me


ylen131

join:2000-02-09
Canoga Park, CA

said by Anon00 See Profile:

said by moseley See Profile:

Current fraud laws could be used. New federal laws could be used. Using the postal Service to commit fraud is crime why not email.
Though getting junk mail isn't a crime so...

And there are laws to protect against out-right fraud, though not civil liability to the person receiving the e-mail, the system is just not equipped to dealing with the massive load that the Internet and E-mail brings. And yes, this is clearly an issue that the Federal government must act on and it is not up to the States to regulate commerce outside their borders but they happy to try to stop the conduct from occurring within their State, and as I understand it, it has been upheld that they can.

What will really stop spam is if stupid people receiving this crap will stop buying from them. I mean honestly, if no one signed up with AOL would they still send you 4 CDs a month in the mail?
no they would send 10cds and would give you first 3 month free.

Anon00
Premium
join:2001-09-25
USA

said by ylen131 See Profile:

no they would send 10cds and would give you first 3 month free.
LoL, true. But I mean more on a widespread scale of them not getting new users. I remember I tried to cancel (and dang thats an hassle) an account I had with them (only signed up to their free offering to get a discount) and they were like offering a free year of service. Of course I still cancelled it
--
"Ah, women. They make the highs higher and the lows more frequent." - Friedrich Nietzsche "'It's the law' is just an excuse for the unintelligent to remain that way" - Me

hskrfan23

join:2004-03-18
West Sacramento, CA

reply to moseley
said by moseley See Profile:

Current fraud laws could be used. New federal laws could be used. Using the postal Service to commit fraud is crime why not email.
I would have to say because email is not a service of the federal government

Ahrenl

join:2004-10-26
North Andover, MA
·Verizon FIOS

said by hskrfan23 See Profile:

said by moseley See Profile:


Current fraud laws could be used. New federal laws could be used. Using the postal Service to commit fraud is crime why not email.
I would have to say because email is not a service of the federal government
Niether is the US Postal service. It was privatized last decade.


ylen131

join:2000-02-09
Canoga Park, CA

said by Ahrenl See Profile:

said by hskrfan23 See Profile:


said by moseley See Profile:



Current fraud laws could be used. New federal laws could be used. Using the postal Service to commit fraud is crime why not email.
I would have to say because email is not a service of the federal government
Niether is the US Postal service. It was privatized last decade.
hahahahaha. Us postal Service gets its budget from us government and no it has not been privatized yet.
Forums » MD Spam Law 'Unconstitutional'« no clue  


Monday, 30-Nov 08:57:37 Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Hosting by www.nac.net - DSL,Hosting & Co-lo | feedback | contact
over 10 years online! © 1999-2009 dslreports.com.republican-creole
page compression OFF
Most commented news this week
· [124] Time Warner Cable Fires Broadside At Broadcasters
· [112] New AT&T Ad Campaign Hits Back At Verizon
· [96] Apple Joins AT&T Verizon Snark Fest
· [87] New Bill Takes Aim At Higher Verizon ETFs
· [82] Weekend Open Thread
· [80] TiVo Sees Record Customer Losses
· [79] Verizon CEO: Hulu Will Be Dead Soon
· [69] In-Flight Internet Headed For Bumpy Landing?
· [63] Thanksgiving Open Thread
· [41] ICANN Slams DNS Redirection
Most people now reading
· Are GPS's better today? [General Questions]
· Considering Leaving Vonage, who should I Consider? [VOIP Tech Chat]
· Windows 7 boot manager editing questions [Microsoft Help]
· [Newsgroups] Newzleech down? [Filesharing Software]
· Whats the big deal about being "Old School"....? [World of Warcraft]
· Leveling to 85 [World of Warcraft]
· [How to] Install Asterisk on an Asus WL-520GU router [VOIP Tech Chat]
· Is Easynews down? [Filesharing Software]
· [ PVP] 3.2 DK PvP D/W Spec... [World of Warcraft]