  ropeguru Premium join:2001-01-25 Bridgeport, WV clubs:
·VOIPo
| reply to Jeremy341 Re: This shouldn't be an issue
BUt in the current posts, as they are right now, combine the sig with the avatar and you can immediately see why it was taken the way it was.
When the sig says "I do not trust Firefox. Spread anything besides that horrid piece of crap." and the avatar states to "Spread the world's most popular browser", one can see just how easy it is to link the two. |
|
  Jeremy341 Bye Premium join:2000-01-06 localhost
| reply to birdfeedr said by birdfeedr :I thought he was responding (admittedly off-topic) to the sig The sig (which won't be showing up in future posts) says nothing about using IE. |
|
  birdfeedr Premium,MVM join:2001-08-11 Warwick, RI
·Verizon FIOS
| reply to Steve said by Steve :Why do this? He likes one browser, you like another: why make it a religious war? ...neither the posting tag nor avatar you were responding to are preserved over time, so if either one of them changes eventually, your flame will be seen as devoid of any context whatsoever. I thought he was responding (admittedly off-topic) to the sig, which is permanent (unless it's edited later to remove the context).
Besides, with some it *is* a religious war as far as Microsoft is concerned.
Of course the irony here is that Jeremy speaks of Sunbelt: "They're just being greedy, and attempting to cash in on this publicity." Many would agree that Microsoft is in this same category of corparate behavior. Hey, all they're trying to do (Sunbelt) is make a few bucks.
Said elsewhere, accurately, "Pot. Kettle. Black." |
|
 eburger68 Premium,MVM join:2001-04-28 | reply to Jeremy341 Hi All:
Alex Eckelberry of Sunbelt has posted in the Security forum thread devoted to this issue:
»Microsoft Acquires GIANT AntiSpyware
Best,
Eric L. Howes |
|
  Jeremy341 Bye Premium join:2000-01-06 localhost
| reply to ropeguru said by ropeguru :So I guess we are being censored on our opinions now too. What? |
|
  alien9999999 Your Head Looks Nice Premium join:2002-05-21 B-3000 | reply to Steve ok, you have a point |
|
  ropeguru Premium join:2001-01-25 Bridgeport, WV clubs: | reply to Jeremy341 So I guess we are being censored on our opinions now too. I see that DSLR is getting to be a place where you can only say what other people think you should. |
|
 bmn ? ? ? Premium,ExMod 2003-06 join:2001-03-15 hiatus
| reply to Jeremy341 Hardly... They are simply attempting to protect their intellectual property rights... They've already invested quite a bit in to this project and apparently are making money off of it. If that's the case, you can't blame them for trying to protect that investment.
Now, where I have heard that come from before?... -- FINALLY its on DVD! Viva La Fee' Verte! |
|
  Jeremy341 Bye Premium join:2000-01-06 localhost
| reply to ropeguru said by ropeguru :And if some other company had bought something that Microsoft had a stake in, Microsoft wouldn't do the same thing?? Maybe they would, maybe they wouldn't. But that's not what's at issue here, so it really doesn't matter what Microsoft would do. |
|
  ropeguru Premium join:2001-01-25 Bridgeport, WV clubs:
·VOIPo
| reply to entropy1 said by entropy1 :Back to the subject of this thread... I totally agree with Jeremy. Sunbelt is just going for a payday on the wings of some publicity or a judge that's about as informed as alien9999999. Leave it to some idiot company to try to ruin something that could be good. I was anxious to see what came of this great tool after Microsoft got hold of it. Now I guess I'll have forgotten about it by the time the courts finish dragging their asses on it. And if some other company had bought something that Microsoft had a stake in, Microsoft wouldn't do the same thing?? |
|
  mrchris We don't miss you Bush Premium join:2002-10-01 North Babylon, NY | reply to Jeremy341 What's the point in spreading it if it's on every friggan Windows installation?  |
|
  Steve I'm a PC, so shut up Consultant join:2001-03-10 Yorba Linda, CA
| reply to alien9999999 said by alien9999999 : sure, but i was offtopic personal flaming jeremy Why do this? He likes one browser, you like another: why make it a religious war?
And you also evince a certain lack of awareness for "context": neither the posting tag nor avatar you were responding to are preserved over time, so if either one of them changes eventually, your flame will be seen as devoid of any context whatsoever.
Steve -- Stephen J. Friedl Unix Wizard Microsoft MVP Tustin, California USA my web site |
|
  alien9999999 Your Head Looks Nice Premium join:2002-05-21 B-3000
| reply to electric_dsl said by electric_dsl :what the HELL are on about? Do you even know what thread you are posting in? sure, but i was offtopic personal flaming jeremy -- Alien is my name and headbiting is my game. |
|
  entropy1 Premium join:2002-09-25
·Millenicom
·Comcast
·Sprint Mobile Broa..
| reply to alien9999999 Lol! One of "those virus writers?". "Easy for worms to sneak in?" I think you're "one of those" people who needs a license to use the internet.
Back to the subject of this thread... I totally agree with Jeremy. Sunbelt is just going for a payday on the wings of some publicity or a judge that's about as informed as alien9999999. Leave it to some idiot company to try to ruin something that could be good. I was anxious to see what came of this great tool after Microsoft got hold of it. Now I guess I'll have forgotten about it by the time the courts finish dragging their asses on it. |
|
 electric_dsl
join:2004-07-20 Pickering, ON | reply to alien9999999 what the HELL are on about?
Do you even know what thread you are posting in? |
|
  alien9999999 Your Head Looks Nice Premium join:2002-05-21 B-3000 | reply to Jeremy341 why do you want people to use IE? You must be one of those virus writers! you want people to use it because IE is easy to use for worms to sneak in!
bah... -- Alien is my name and headbiting is my game. |
|
  Jeremy341 Bye Premium join:2000-01-06 localhost
| Microsoft has already said that they'd provide definition updates to Sunbelt for the remainder of the contract term, but apparently that's not good enough for them. They're just being greedy, and attempting to cash in on this publicity. -- I do not trust Firefox. Spread anything besides that horrid piece of crap. |
|