Search:  

 
 
   All ForumsHot TopicsGallery






how-to block ads


 
Forums » Minny Fights to Tax VoIP » When are they going to learn?
Search Topic:
Share Topic:
RSS topic:
toggle:
flat / full
normal / watch
Post a:
Post a:
« Doesn't look like it passed......  
AuthorAll Replies


davoice

join:2000-08-12
Saxapahaw, NC
·Comporium

reply to CO_Chris
Re: When are they going to learn?

No... in case you haven't noticed, the court system in America has the final word. The legislative and executive branches of our government have had their nuts clipped by the judicial branch for pretty much all of the last 30 years. And the executive branch (esp the Office of the President) doesn't seem willing to challenge the status quo by forcing some more sensible judge candidates into the mix.

- Davoice

russotto

join:2000-10-05
Collegeville, PA
Unless they're going to argue that VoIP isn't interstate commerce, the courts are unlikely to overrule the FCC on this one, though.


davoice

join:2000-08-12
Saxapahaw, NC
·Comporium


1 edit
I'm waiting for someone like the UN to chime in that VOIP and internet service is international commerce and thus only subject to international commerce laws. Just wait for the first European company to start terminating US based DIDs on a EU based softswitch and things will get very interesting.

Edit: And yes, that is technically possible. You could route SS& call setup traffic via an international ATM connection and provide the termination and setup for calls destined for the US via IP. I just don't think it's cost effective yet. But let a Euro carrier get some scale and you might see some interesting effects.

- Davoice


tapeloop
1959. I try to kick the ball. I miss.
Premium
join:2004-06-27
Airstrip One

said by davoice See Profile:

I'm waiting for someone like the UN to chime in that VOIP and internet service is international commerce and thus only subject to international commerce laws. Just wait for the first European company to start terminating US based DIDs on a EU based softswitch and things will get very interesting.

Edit: And yes, that is technically possible. You could route SS& call setup traffic via an international ATM connection and provide the termination and setup for calls destined for the US via IP. I just don't think it's cost effective yet. But let a Euro carrier get some scale and you might see some interesting effects.
The technical part may be correct, but that part about the UN isn't. The UN isn't so much a governing body so much as an organization where sovereign member nations pay dues. (Which the US hasn't been doing much of lately... )

You're probably thinking of the WTO. In which case the existing international telecom agreements would probably apply, but I'm not too well-versed in that area.


davoice

join:2000-08-12
Saxapahaw, NC
·Comporium

Actually, the UN has been eyeing controlling the internet - along with the ITU. There has been quite bit of mumbling within UN committies about taking control of the internet away from the US (and entities like ICANN) and bringing it into the UN.
- Davoice


tapeloop
1959. I try to kick the ball. I miss.
Premium
join:2004-06-27
Airstrip One

said by davoice See Profile:

Actually, the UN has been eyeing controlling the internet - along with the ITU. There has been quite bit of mumbling within UN committies about taking control of the internet away from the US (and entities like ICANN) and bringing it into the UN.
Have any links with such info? I haven't heard anything about this UN push.

russotto

join:2000-10-05
Collegeville, PA
reply to davoice
It's done all the time the other way around -- companies in Canada sometimes route Canada-to-Canada calls through the US because it's cheaper that way. Or it was; that loophole might have been fixed since I heard of it.


davoice

join:2000-08-12
Saxapahaw, NC
·Comporium

reply to tapeloop
»www.techcentralstation.com/121503E.html

»www.detnews.com/2004/technology/···5722.htm

»www.washtimes.com/world/20031208···682r.htm

- Daniel


tapeloop
1959. I try to kick the ball. I miss.
Premium
join:2004-06-27
Airstrip One

  Thanks for the links. Very enlightening.

Still, I think the VOIP/commerce issue would be more in the WTO's bailiwick than the UN or whatever task force they come up with.

On one hand, there's good potential in allowing other countries--developing nations especially--help guide the development of the Internet. Hopefully it would give freedom of communication to countries like China and North Korea. (Wouldn't hold my breath though. )

Then again, I'm not too keen on a body with a track record such as the UN's running the 'Net. (Have they fixed anything lately? ) Fortunately there was compromise thanks to Japan, the EU and Canada(eh).
Forums » Minny Fights to Tax VoIP« Doesn't look like it passed......  


Tuesday, 10-Nov 06:38:00 Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Hosting by www.nac.net - DSL,Hosting & Co-lo | feedback | contact
over 10 years online! © 1999-2009 dslreports.com.
page compression OFF
Most commented news this week
· [83] VoIP Over 3G Still Not Working For iPhone
· [82] Verizon Keeps Swinging At AT&T
· [33] Bill Would Force ISPs To Block Financial Scams
· [24] Mediacom Hints At 50, 100 Mbps Speeds
· [14] Clearwire To Get Another $1.5 Billion
· [11] Monday Morning Links
· [9] 15 States Have Now Gotten Broadband Mapping Money
· [6] AT&T Launching New 7.2 Mbps 3G Modem
Most people now reading
· Windows 7 boot manager editing questions [Microsoft Help]
· 3.x Feral Druid - Bear Tanking Guide [World of Warcraft]
· WoW Updater cannot find wow.exe? [World of Warcraft]
· My cat is reluctant to exercise. [General Questions]
· How in the world am I going to get into college? [General Questions]
· Framed for child porn 151; by a PC virus [Security]
· netTalk tk6000 [VOIP Tech Chat]
· MI424WR-GEN2 Rev E Configuration Thread [Verizon Fiber Optics]
· Know when to run! [Home Repair & Improvement]
· [ PVP] 3.2 DK PvP D/W Spec... [World of Warcraft]