Dude111
An Awesome Dude
Premium
join:2003-08-04
USA
 ·Time Warner VOIP
| reply to coffaro
Re: Working on it
In my area,TIME WARNER does still broadcast ANALOG (from 2 - 83,A-1) They repeast the analog one's above on the digital side (Which i think sucks!!!!! If your paying for DIGITAL SERVICE,and you go ABOVE 100,you should see the DIGITAL side of it)
Ah well.......... |
|
Corvus
Flaming Tards Since 2003
Premium,VIP
join:2003-11-26
| said by Dude111  :In my area,TIME WARNER does still broadcast ANALOG (from 2 - 83,A-1) They repeast the analog one's above on the digital side (Which i think sucks!!!!! If your paying for DIGITAL SERVICE,and you go ABOVE 100,you should see the DIGITAL side of it) Ah well.......... Yes it sucks but I guess your cable company is short in QAM and need to upgrade their network. The cable company I work for (Canadian) is feeding 100% digital channels to their subscribers. It takes more QAM but it helps to fights against satellite companies. We're working with 750Mhz and few 500Mhz networks.
--
Jesus saves, but only Buddha makes incremental backups. |
|
imrf
Premium
join:2002-06-06
Utica, MI | QAM is a modulation technique!!! A cable company can not become short in QAM, the become short in bandwidth or open frequencies. If you actually work for a cable company you should at least have the proper terminology down. |
|
Corvus
Flaming Tards Since 2003
Premium,VIP
join:2003-11-26
| said by imrf :QAM is a modulation technique!!! A cable company can not become short in QAM, the become short in bandwidth or open frequencies. If you actually work for a cable company you should at least have the proper terminology down. I used the term short in QAM to illustrate the fact that all current QAM in use are full (full bandwith used).
--
Jesus saves, but only Buddha makes incremental backups. |
|
DrTCP
Yours truly
Premium,ExMod 1999-04
join:1999-11-09
Round Rock, TX
| reply to Dude111
said by Dude111 :In my area,TIME WARNER does still broadcast ANALOG (from 2 - 83,A-1) They repeast the analog one's above on the digital side (Which i think sucks!!!!! If your paying for DIGITAL SERVICE,and you go ABOVE 100,you should see the DIGITAL side of it) Ah well.......... In Austin, TX and surrounding areas they do the same. They alias the analog channel in the digital lineup. You can notice that easily even if you are not technically inclined. The dot noise is noticable for analog channels and when you switch to an analog channel the usual delay that occurs with digital channels is absent.
With more than half of the digital channels are actually analog there is no real incentive to upgrade to digital and pay for extra STB rental fees etc. for me. When they go 90% or more digital (and preferably HDTV by then) then I will probably upgrade. |
|
en102
Canadian, eh?
join:2001-01-26
Valencia, CA | reply to Corvus
I'm impressed - i thought it would only be Shaw, Cogeco and possibly Rogers that would be 100% digital on the digital side. |
|
Corvus
Flaming Tards Since 2003
Premium,VIP
join:2003-11-26
| said by en102 :I'm impressed - i thought it would only be Shaw, Cogeco and possibly Rogers that would be 100% digital on the digital side. Videotron always cared about it's network, believing in it's power for delivering interactive content since the early 90's. Some parts of the network could even handle 1Ghz frequency (adding tons of new QAM  ).
--
Jesus saves, but only Buddha makes incremental backups. |
|
jess12349
join:2003-12-28
Valrico, FL
|  reply to Dude111
I'm waiting for things to get up and running here in the Tampa Bay area. Verizon is working this area now putting fiber to each house. I'm told there are going thru the whole state. My house is on a hub with two others houses. One of the techs said three houses per hub. Sounds real interesting. Haven't heard what they will offer. I got Brighthouse (TW) cable now. The net is pretty good 3Mbps download. The HD TV sucks. 480I is all they offer now. It sucks! You can see why I'm waiting for Verizon.:) |
|
