site Search:


 
    All Forums Hot Topics Gallery






how-to block ads


 
Search Topic:
Share Topic
Posting?
Post a:
Post a:
Links: ·Hijack This logs? ·Panda Free Tools ·Vundo Removal
AuthorAll Replies

mens rea
Premium
join:2002-01-31
Canada

reply to aussie in uk

Re: Java/Byte Verify

Some further info: »ByteVerify Myth within Sun Java Cache

B
Premium,MVM
join:2000-10-28


Thanks, mens rea See Profile! Perfect thread reference.

So then the files may be harmless in context, but they DO contain intentionally malicious code?

I wouldn't call those "false positives" then. It's the same as finding a Windows file in a .ZIP archive while scanning on a Linux server.

-- B
--
In a realm outside causality and function



aussie in uk

@range81-132.btcentra

reply to mens rea
Hi all, Thanks for all the info. Really appreciate it.

I have had a look at all the suggestions, I am not running any version (To my knowledge) of sun java....
I have been able to locate the jar files & delete them & my av is not picking it up as a threat anymore - but there is an infected archive I noticed on the av that appears locked or I can not delete it? Any problems with this? If it is all ok, what is best to protect in the future?


mens rea
Premium
join:2002-01-31
Canada
Reviews:
·Shaw

said by aussie in uk:

I have had a look at all the suggestions, I am not running any version (To my knowledge) of sun java....
I have been able to locate the jar files & delete them & my av is not picking it up as a threat anymore - but there is an infected archive I noticed on the av that appears locked or I can not delete it? Any problems with this? If it is all ok, what is best to protect in the future?
Don't know your OS but it may be worth your while to check to see what version of java you are running (assuming it is MSJVM): Check for MSJVM If it is build 3810 or later it will be a patched version and not vulnerable to the exploit, as Name Game See Profile points out in the link I referenced: MSB MS03-011


aussie in uk

@range81-132.btcentra

Awesome thanks, Have checked all that & appears that I am running version 3810, So Happy now.
Cheers all. Aussie in UK.



Martinus
Premium
join:2001-08-06
EU

reply to B

said by B:

So then the files may be harmless in context, but they DO contain intentionally malicious code?

I wouldn't call those "false positives" then. It's the same as finding a Windows file in a .ZIP archive while scanning on a Linux server.
This is exactly what I was suggesting in the thread linked by mens rea See Profile
--
From the GSV "Ethics Gradient"

Monday, 04-Jun 10:15:48 Terms of Use & Privacy | feedback | contact | Hosting by nac.net - DSL,Hosting & Co-lo
over 12.5 years online © 1999-2012 dslreports.com.
Most commented news this week
Hot Topics