dare99me
@optonline.net | reply to Karl Bode
Re: No wonder
Fees should not be imposed until fcc finalizes any taxes on Voip, rite now there are none!! |
|
en102
Canadian, eh?
join:2001-01-26
Valencia, CA | reply to Karl Bode
It's more of 'Here's what we have to pay our lawyers and lobbiests, and a slush fund' fee right now, and eventually, it will be 'Here's what we have to pay our lawyers and uncle Sam, and the rest is for the slush fund' |
|
Karl Bode
News Guy
join:2000-03-02
Host:
Road Runner
PC gaming GAMES
PC gaming Tech
1 edit | reply to HiVolt
They use the same lame reason the bells do. It's in "anticipation" of future regulation.
quote:
This fee is charged to our Lingo customers to recover the costs of certain regulatory and compliance requirements imposed, or expected to be imposed
Can we as end users "anticipate" ass-ish service and deduct $1.50 a month?
Ironically in the bells case, they've been seeing significant de-regulation, so maybe they'll start paying us.  |
|
HiVolt
29
Premium
join:2000-12-28
Toronto, ON
clubs:
 ·TekSavvy Solutions..
·Bell Sympatico
| reply to asonnyb
How can they call it regulatory fee when VoIP isnt even regulated? WHat a crock of sh*t.
--
}·.¸¸.·´¯`·.¸¸.·´¯`·.¸¸.·´¯`·.¸¸.·´¯`·.¸¸.·´¯`·.¸¸.·´¯`·.¸¸.·´ |
|
