Re: No wonder

Forums » The Rise of 'Unfees' » No wonder


Share Topic:	RSS topic:	toggle: flat / full normal / watch	Post a:	Post a:

Expect this to showup more and more »
« unfees...

Karl Bode
News Guy
join:2000-03-02

Host:
Road Runner
PC gaming GAMES
PC gaming Tech

1 edit

They use the same lame reason the bells do. It's in "anticipation" of future regulation.

quote:
This fee is charged to our Lingo customers to recover the costs of certain regulatory and compliance requirements imposed, or expected to be imposed

Can we as end users "anticipate" ass-ish service and deduct $1.50 a month?

Ironically in the bells case, they've been seeing significant de-regulation, so maybe they'll start paying us.

permalink · 2005-01-07 13:20:48 · Print ·

en102 Canadian, eh? join:2001-01-26 Valencia, CA	Re: No wonder It's more of 'Here's what we have to pay our lawyers and lobbiests, and a slush fund' fee right now, and eventually, it will be 'Here's what we have to pay our lawyers and uncle Sam, and the rest is for the slush fund'
	permalink · 2005-01-07 17:39:14 ·

dare99me @optonline.net	Fees should not be imposed until fcc finalizes any taxes on Voip, rite now there are none!!
	permalink · 2005-01-07 17:56:10 ·

your comment..

Forums » The Rise of 'Unfees'

Expect this to showup more and more »
« unfees...


Saturday, 28-Nov 09:07:30	Terms of Use \| Privacy Policy \| Hosting by www.nac.net - DSL,Hosting & Co-lo \| feedback \| contact over 10 years online! © 1999-2009 dslreports.com.republican-creole page compression OFF