Keizer
I'M Your Huckleberry
Premium,MVM
join:2003-01-20
| reply to anthrorules
Re: ObjectDock 1.1 released!
said by anthrorules  :My reply was not to you, Keizer, but to jeffandlina, who stated:
Being that I am always concerned systen resources, this is my favourite desktop...very simple...takes almost no memory.
I know. I was just wanting to nip any conflict that may start in the bud! This is simply an informative thread that there is an OD update available.
Keizer |
|
anthrorules
Premium
join:2003-09-14
Rollinsville, CO
 ·Qwest.net
 ·IonSKY
1 edit | reply to Keizer
My reply was not to you, Keizer, but to jeffandlina, who stated:
Being that I am always concerned systen resources, this is my favourite desktop...very simple...takes almost no memory.
--
ionSKY Wireless ISP - 2.4GHz - 802.11b - 1.0MB/384kbps | Dell Dimension 4550/WinXP Pro/SP2/768MB Ram -- Dell Inspiron 5150/WinXP Pro/SP2/512MB Ram |Kerio Personal Firewall 2.1.5 | NAT Router/Firewall | NETGEAR WGT624v2 Wireless Firewall/Router |
|
Keizer
I'M Your Huckleberry
Premium,MVM
join:2003-01-20
| reply to anthrorules
said by anthrorules :okay, how does that have to do with ObjectDock being released, which btw, does not consume much memory and cpu? Your right, ObjectDock does not consume much memory, or CPU. I only mentioned it in my original post because others claim that is why they won't try OD. I really did not intend on this thread becoming a big bashing match between those using OD, and others who use XP's built in quick launch or something else. I was simply starting a thread to make other ObjectDock users aware that there is an update. If others use another method for the same thing OD does, good for you!  I personally could care less how much memory something uses. I have a gig of RAM, and when that is used up, I have two more slots available on my motherboard.
Keizer |
|
