Search:  

 
 
   All ForumsHot TopicsGallery






how-to block ads


 
Forums » Disabled Bluetooth » Tear Them A New Arse!!!
Search Topic:
Uniqs:
88
Share Topic:
RSS topic:
toggle:
flat / full
normal / watch
Post a:
Post a:
« CDMA phones and providers suck, end of story.  
AuthorAll Replies


technick
Premium
join:2000-12-16
Loganville, GA

 Tear Them A New Arse!!!

I hope that they are slapped with a huge fine and forced to stop disabling features on phones so they make more money. I am going to recommend to all of my clients / friends who are considering verizon to stay away from them at all costs. This is just plain crazy.
--
"Our greatest glory consists not in never falling, but in rising everytime we fall." - Confucius - - - - - - - - - - - Streamfire.net- - AIM - CoNFuCiUsNiCk


Anonymous
Premium
join:2004-06-01
IA
Even if they get a big fine they will simply increase rates so the actual users will cover the cost...
--
anon43@gmail.com


Steve
I'm a PC, so shut up
Consultant
join:2001-03-10
Yorba Linda, CA

reply to technick
said by technick See Profile:

I hope that they are slapped with a huge fine and forced to stop disabling features on phones so they make more money.
That's not the only solution: if they simply disclose the conditions of the service, then consumers can make their own choices up front.

Steve
--
Stephen J. Friedl • Unix Wizard • Microsoft Security MVP • Tustin, California USA • my web site

JPCass

join:2001-01-23
Denver, CO

said by Steve See Profile:

That's not the only solution: if they simply disclose the conditions of the service, then consumers can make their own choices up front.
They may well have disclosed it - in one of those magazine-length EULAs - and if not, that is where it probably would go, where it would do consumers little good.

markj99999

join:2003-01-13
Manhattan Beach, CA

reply to Steve
Steve, well said!

My big objection to Verizon's behavior is that they don't actually come out and SAY that pictures YOU take can only be extracted via their pay per item service! It may be "common knowledge" to some, but it's certainly not common knowledge. And that's the way Verizon wants it.

While they don't even mention the disabling of the USB transfers, when they do actually mention the limitations to Bluetooth, they claim this modifications were made "for security of our customers".

That, my friends, is an out and out LIE. And Verizon managment knows it. It's this underhanded and deceptive aspect of their "business model" that being challenged.

If Verizon had just come out and admitted UP FRONT, in their ads and/or on the box, that media cannot be changed with paying Verizon a fee per item, or even A SINGLE PARAGRAPH in the manual, this whole issue would change from one of deceptive advertising to one of informed consent, and this thread and the lawsuit, would likely not even exist.


Derch
Premium
join:2004-10-16
Tulsa, OK
reply to Steve
I think that they can make Verizon enable it if they do win. Don't these phones have everything but the firmware?


Snickerdo
Premium
join:2001-02-28
Niagara Falls, ON

said by Derch See Profile:

I think that they can make Verizon enable it if they do win. Don't these phones have everything but the firmware?
Pretty much, yup. GSM users would never put up with this sort of crap. I don't know why CDMA users do.
--
Bigot - Someone that has won an argument with a Liberal.
Yes, I CanChat. Can You? www.fiberal.ca

Appraiser

join:2005-01-17
Santa Cruz, CA
I have 4 Verizon accounts and am gradually moving them to T-Mobile as contracts expire. Wonder why there is no security issue with my GSM phones?


Snickerdo
Premium
join:2001-02-28
Niagara Falls, ON

said by Appraiser See Profile:

I have 4 Verizon accounts and am gradually moving them to T-Mobile as contracts expire. Wonder why there is no security issue with my GSM phones?
Because GSM providers know that the more intelligent users - the ones who actually want these features - will be able to get the phone unlocked and move it to another GSM provider, or flash the firmware/modify the FLEX to enable the feature anyway. GSM providers couldn't care less what phone you use as it's all in the SIM card. CDMA providers, however, have a notoriously bad habit of not activating any phones that aren't in their database of 'valid' ESNs.
--
Bigot - Someone that has won an argument with a Liberal.
Yes, I CanChat. Can You? www.fiberal.ca
Forums » Disabled Bluetooth« CDMA phones and providers suck, end of story.  


Saturday, 05-Dec 16:34:01 Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Hosting by www.nac.net - DSL,Hosting & Co-lo | feedback | contact
over 10 years online! © 1999-2009 dslreports.com.
page compression OFF
Most commented news this week
· [163] Comcast Releasing Promised Usage Meter
· [147] Avast Antivirus Has Gone Mad
· [127] Comcast Makes NBC Universal Acquisition Official
· [104] Graduate Student Unveils Sprint's GPS Sharing With Feds
· [101] Google Invades ISP, OpenDNS Turf With Google Public DNS
· [99] The Bandwidth Hog Does Not Exist
· [85] FCC Ponders Moving From PSTN To IP Voice
· [81] Latest Consumer Reports Survey Not Kind To AT&T
· [80] New Bill Aims To Limit ETFs
· [74] Sprint Defuses GPS Privacy Media Bomb
Most people now reading
· Wife might have to work in.... Iowa for a few months!!! [General Questions]
· False positive in Avast! or is it real? [Security]
· DNS options, what are YOU using? [TekSavvy]
· Connecting to Google Voice Via SIP [VOIP Tech Chat]
· Farewell [Bell Canada]
· 3.x Feral Druid - Bear Tanking Guide [World of Warcraft]
· Windows 7 boot manager editing questions [Microsoft Help]
· First commercial tool to crack BitLocker arrives (Updated) [Security]
· UPS - What do you people think happened? [General Questions]
· [How to] Install Asterisk on an Asus WL-520GU router [VOIP Tech Chat]