entropy1
Premium
join:2002-09-25 | Re: Good Response Yes, nice, but the grammar issues did detract from it. It's somewhat disappointing to see that the person defending this issue can't even write well. ("...in a MANNER of minutes..."?)
Yikes. | |
|
 
W8ASA
Tieng gi vay?
join:2000-07-31
Dayton, OH
clubs:  | Re: Good Response heh heh: What's the matter with manner? heh heh | |
|
|
 | 
ROCINANTE 2112
Original Member 007
join:1999-06-29
Hartsdale, NY
clubs: | Re: Good Response Comma splicing?
--
CRUNCH THIS!
| |
|
| | 
Grail Knight
Who Dares Wins
Premium
join:2003-05-31
 ·Verizon Online DSL
| Re: Good Response First error I see is the use of “It's”, there is no ownership in this instance so “It is” would be used.
Can't should be "cannot".
Silly grammar nitpicking yet it was pointed out for the Vendor's lawyer showing we all make mistakes. 
--
Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.7.6) Gecko/20050223 Firefox/1.0.1 Aviary--Thunderbird version 20050222 1.0.1 Aviary | |
|
| | | 
tapeloop
1959. I try to kick the ball. I miss.
Premium
join:2004-06-27
Airstrip One
| Re: Good Response said by Grail Knight  :First error I see is the use of “It's”, there is no ownership in this instance so “It is” would be used. Can't should be "cannot". Silly grammar nitpicking yet it was pointed out for the Vendor's lawyer showing we all make mistakes. Um...you do know that "it's" is a contraction of "it is" right? So the 2 can be used interchangeably.
»www.cgl.uwaterloo.ca/~csk/its.html
»www.stormloader.com/garyes/its/#top
»www.wsu.edu/~brians/errors/its.html
Use of "can't" is a preference. While grammatically correct, one should avoid the use of contractions in formal correspondence. I don't think internet message boards qualify. 
Appropriate that you would choose "it's" to nitpick, considering that you seem to be a Python fan.  | |
|
| | | |
Grail Knight
Who Dares Wins
Premium
join:2003-05-31
·Verizon Online DSL
| Re: Good Response The Knights who say "Ni--!".
Of course my ref. to grammar was in jest to those that would pick others apart. Granted a lawyer should have proof read his work.
--
Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.7.6) Gecko/20050223 Firefox/1.0.1 AviaryThunderbird version 20050222 1.0.1 Aviary | |
|
| | | | |
tapeloop
1959. I try to kick the ball. I miss.
Premium
join:2004-06-27
Airstrip One
| Re: Good Response Heh. So by criticizing your post satirizing people who criticize grammar, I created a sort of recursive irony.
"NOBODY expects the Spanish Inquisition!!!"
Man, maybe I should get some work done today... | |
|
| | | | | | 
antwanp
Beyond FM, Beyond AM, XM Satellite Radio
Premium
join:2002-05-14
Cedar Hill, TX
clubs: | Re: Good Response Lol!
-Antwan L. | |
|
| | | | | |
Grail Knight
Who Dares Wins
Premium
join:2003-05-31 | Well if this darn snow would go away I could tend to my shrubbery! | |
|
| | | | | | | 
wolfox
Gentle Wolfox
join:2002-11-27
Dunnellon, FL | Re: Good Response With a herring? | |
|
| | | 
pc319
Premium
join:2002-04-24
The Q
1 edit | I thought that the word "it's" is another way to say "It is". That is what the apostrophe is for.
I think the word you are thinking of is "its" signifies ownership.
edit: nevermind I see that tapeloop posted that before me | |
|
|
|
|
