 GamerSupreme
join:2004-08-31
| Couldn't think of a title...
Why do people say that the anti-spyware companies got Cease and Desist letters because of voicing their opinion on their website?
In actual fact they categorized it as Spyware/Malware/Foist ware in their search definitions.
Also here everyone is going on about iDownloads bluff of taking it to court but if its that obvious then why don't the anti-spyware companies see that?
And finally in my opinion, if it uses shady installation techniques then 99% of the time it has something sinister to hide so if they are in the 1% they should state why they exploit flaws otherwise their software is unwanted and should be removed if installed. |