Search:  

 
 
   All ForumsHot TopicsGallery






how-to block ads


 
Forums » The Site » Old Forums » Technology Law & Politics » FCC Decency Standards for Cable
Search Topic:
Share Topic:
RSS topic:
toggle:
flat / full
normal / watch
Posting:
AuthorAll Replies


Karl Bode
News Guy
join:2000-03-02
reply to ppcpunk
Re: FCC Decency Standards for Cable

True. A bizarre Republic where money is god, Truth is whomever has the better PR team, and a Public that apparently could care less.


ppcpunk

join:2001-02-11
Davenport, IA
reply to ColdFiltered
FYI no one actually is living in a democracy.


ColdFiltered

join:2005-01-25
Atlanta, GA

reply to tschmidt
said by tschmidt See Profile:

Gee I though a market based economy eschews government intervention.

If advertisers want to support porn because customers want it shouldn't they be allowed to do whatever sells?

Isn't this an unlawful taking, diminishing the value of private property by big government? I would have though Conservatives would be outraged at government interference.
You think you are in a Democracy. Knock it off!

DonLibes
Premium,ExMod 2001
join:2003-01-19

reply to tschmidt
said by tschmidt See Profile:

Gee I though a market based economy eschews government intervention.

If advertisers want to support porn because customers want it shouldn't they be allowed to do whatever sells.
Porn is only part of the issue. The other part is the use of language, pictures, and ideas, that are offensive to some people. For example, the inability to use the word "fuck" during primetime meant that over-the-air networks couldn't literally report what Cheney said last year on the floor of the Senate.

»www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/ar···n24.html


tschmidt
Premium,MVM
join:2000-11-12
Milford, NH
·Hollis Hosting
·Verizon Online DSL
·Fairpoint Communic..


1 edit
reply to DonLibes
Gee I though a market based economy eschews government intervention.

If advertisers want to support porn because customers want it shouldn't they be allowed to do whatever sells?

Isn't this an unlawful taking, diminishing the value of private property by big government? I would have though Conservatives would be outraged at government interference.
Forums » The Site » Old Forums » Technology Law & Politics


Friday, 04-Dec 04:31:04 Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Hosting by www.nac.net - DSL,Hosting & Co-lo | feedback | contact
over 10 years online! © 1999-2009 dslreports.com.
page compression OFF
Most commented news this week
· [162] Comcast Releasing Promised Usage Meter
· [141] Avast Antivirus Has Gone Mad
· [104] Graduate Student Unveils Sprint's GPS Sharing With Feds
· [102] Comcast Makes NBC Universal Acquisition Official
· [85] Google Invades ISP, OpenDNS Turf With Google Public DNS
· [81] Latest Consumer Reports Survey Not Kind To AT&T
· [70] Baltimore To Ban Lazy Cable Installs
· [65] Sprint Defuses GPS Privacy Media Bomb
· [64] Broadband Killed The Game Console
· [59] FCC Ponders Moving From PSTN To IP Voice
Most people now reading
· False positive in Avast! or is it real? [Security]
· Windows 7 boot manager editing questions [Microsoft Help]
· 3.x Feral Druid - Bear Tanking Guide [World of Warcraft]
· [WIN7] Outlook express under Windows 7? [Microsoft Help]
· [ Classes] 3.2.2 Rogue [World of Warcraft]
· Connecting to Google Voice Via SIP [VOIP Tech Chat]
· [WotLK] Whats the level 80 pve spec for mages? [World of Warcraft]
· Using AirMax to provide triple play services? [Wireless Service Providers]
· [Business] how to bridge a smc 8014 business class modem [Comcast HSI]
· [Rant] Disrespect of PTO [Rants, Raves, and Praise]