IhatemyISP
MM2 Corbski
Premium
join:2003-01-27
Japan
 ·Sprint Mobile Broa..
 ·Comcast
| reply to kapil
Re: Cool!
Likewise here.
Gmail is quite possibly the most friendly, well coded, well thought out webmail available. If Google Calender is anything like Gmail, sign me up now!
--
Torrentflux - ircd.removed.us - #dslr - Ex. BS FastAccess 2Wire Supervisor |
|
rtcpenguin
Premium
join:2001-01-21
Fairfax, VA | Google is such a wondrous, mysterious company...everything they touch turns to gold! |
|
Unxchay
join:2003-10-14
Milwaukee, WI
 ·AT&T U-Verse
| reply to IhatemyISP
...Except for its lack of HTML encoding, no add'l POP account checking/sending, no ability to sort mail by sender and general lack of customization. Labels are nice, but it needs work.
Ultimately GMail can be the top webmail service available, but they need to incorporate amenities that their competitors have been offering for years.
Cheers,
TOM |
|
IhatemyISP
MM2 Corbski
Premium
join:2003-01-27
Japan
·Sprint Mobile Broa..
·Comcast
| said by Unxchay  :...Except for its lack of HTML encoding, no add'l POP account checking/sending, no ability to sort mail by sender and general lack of customization. Labels are nice, but it needs work. Ultimately GMail can be the top webmail service available, but they need to incorporate amenities that their competitors have been offering for years. Cheers, TOM Gmail beta 
--
Torrentflux - ircd.removed.us - #dslr - Ex. BS FastAccess 2Wire Supervisor |
|
yock
TFTC
Premium
join:2000-11-21
Fairfield, OH
| said by IhatemyISP :said by Unxchay :...Except for its lack of HTML encoding, no add'l POP account checking/sending, no ability to sort mail by sender and general lack of customization. Labels are nice, but it needs work. Ultimately GMail can be the top webmail service available, but they need to incorporate amenities that their competitors have been offering for years. Cheers, TOM Gmail beta Major features aren't typically added to beta and subsequent releases of anything. Google is relying upon their search indexing to make-up for the lack of standard sorting features. It works for some but not all, just don't expect them to add those sorting features now.
--
Statistical correlation need not imply causation.
Technical Nirvana |
|
john262
join:2003-09-26
Elko, NV | reply to Unxchay
A lack of HTML encoding is one of the main things I like about it. Text only email is much safer and should be the world wide standard. |
|
wwdubbia
join:2002-06-03
Clinton, NY
| reply to Unxchay
said by Unxchay :...Except for its lack of HTML encoding, no add'l POP account checking/sending, no ability to sort mail by sender and general lack of customization. Labels are nice, but it needs work. Ultimately GMail can be the top webmail service available, but they need to incorporate amenities that their competitors have been offering for years. Cheers, TOM hmmm... I can easily sort by sender by using their innovative label feature. Lack of customization?? I can specify a lot more customizations via their settings interface than I could ever do with hotmail.
Gmail rocks. Need an invite? Send me an note and I'll send you an invite. |
|
