 | Microsoft Security Bulletin Revisions ******************************************************************** Title: Microsoft Security Bulletin Minor Revisions Issued: March 8, 2005 ********************************************************************
Summary ======= The following bulletins have undergone a major revision increment. Please see the appropriate bulletin for more details.
* MS05-002 * MS05-015
Bulletin Information: =====================
* MS05-002
- »www.microsoft.com/technet/securi···002.mspx - Reason for re-release: Frequently Asked Questions updated to reflect Windows 98, 98SE and ME security update availability.
- Originally posted: January 11, 2005 - Updated: March 8, 2005 - Bulletin Severity Rating: Critical - Version: 1.2
* MS05-015
- »www.microsoft.com/technet/securi···015.mspx - Reason for re-release: Frequently Asked Questions updated to reflect Windows 98, 98SE and ME security update availability.
- Originally posted: February 8, 2005 - Updated: March 8, 2005 - Bulletin Severity Rating: Critical - Version: 1.2
******************************************************************** -- Because Goldengamegod won't fit:p |
|
 SUMwarePremium join:2002-05-21 kudos:2 | After installing both these updates this afternoon on 98SE, the cursor has moved eratically and my system has locked several times, internet access blocked, hard reboots required.
I've uninstalled both patches, restored previous hlink.dll file, restored previous good registry, and still have problem. Uninstall does not fix problems.
Should have known better than to DL MS patches immediately.
Anyone else? |
|
 madylarianThe curmudgeonlyPremium join:2002-01-03 Parkville, MD | reply to Goldengamego I installed them on my XP Pro system and haven't noticed any problems.
mady -- Honi soit qui mal y pense |
|
 AlwillLost time is never found again.Premium,MVM join:2002-09-25 Sydney, OZ | reply to SUMware said by SUMware:After installing both these updates this afternoon on 98SE, the cursor has moved eratically and my system has locked several times, internet access blocked, hard reboots required. I've uninstalled both patches, restored previous hlink.dll file, restored previous good registry, and still have problem. Uninstall does not fix problems. Should have known better than to DL MS patches immediately. Anyone else? Sorry that you're having trouble but I installed both patches on 98SE over an hour ago and thus far have encountered no problems whatsoever. -- Tact is the art of making a point without making an enemy - Anonymous |
|
 BlackbirdBuilt for SpeedPremium join:2005-01-14 Fort Wayne, IN kudos:3 Reviews:
·Frontier Communi..
| reply to Goldengamego Installed both updates and things are still working fine on this Win98 SP1 system. Pretty small downloads, though... 176Kb and 149Kb for 888113, 891711 respectively and no reboot required afterwards - at least on this computer. -- If God wanted us to work with electrons, He'd make them big enough to see... |
|
 1 edit | reply to Goldengamego BTW: If you want to receive these emails from MS when a security bulletin is revised go to »profile.micoosft.com and subscribe to the "Microsoft Security Notification Service: Comprehensive Version" list.
Don't ask why they didn't include these in with the standard bulletin emails, that apparently made to much sense
EDIT: https
-- Because Goldengamegod won't fit:p |
|
 SUMwarePremium join:2002-05-21 kudos:2 | reply to Goldengamego Still trying to track this down. Before these patches I never had any problems with Firefox. Now, while browsing, my system periodically freezes suddenly. Same with IE.
When I open both browsers at same time my system locks. Never happened before. And mouse behavior is erratic with previously ok settings.
I've cleaned, scanned, restored & rebuilt registry, uninstalled patches, etc. Weird. Never had a problem like this before. My system was very stable.
Will keep at it. Thank you all for your responses. |
|
 BlackbirdBuilt for SpeedPremium join:2005-01-14 Fort Wayne, IN kudos:3 Reviews:
·Frontier Communi..
| As you've already observed, both patches supposedly are uninstallable via Add/Remove. FWIW, buried down within the Vulnerability Details FAQ of each patch is a brief explanation of what each general "fix" was that was patched into Win98:
MS05-002/891711 »www.microsoft.com/technet/securi···002.mspx "Cursor & Icon Handling Vulnerability What does the update do? The update removes the vulnerability by modifying the way that cursors, animated cursor, and icon formats are validated prior to rendering."
MS05-015/888113 »www.microsoft.com/technet/securi···015.mspx Hyperlink Object Library Vulnerability "What does the update do? The update removes the vulnerability by modifying the way that the Hyperlink Object Library validates the length of a message before it passes the message to the allocated buffer."
Note: The 888113 update installs file 888113.qfe in \Windows\System; no other new files appear to have been installed by either patch, at least on my Win98 system. -- If God wanted us to work with electrons, He'd make them big enough to see... |
|
 Jrb2Premium join:2001-08-31 kudos:3 | - - quote - - Note: The 888113 update installs file 888113.qfe in \Windows\System; no other new files appear to have been installed by either patch, at least on my Win98 system. - - end quote - -
Hi,
I installed those MS updates yesterday on my W98SE (Dutch). I do have new files (report from NIS File Check):
Application: c:\windows\system\kb891711\kb891711.exe Status: New added Version old: 4.10.2222 Size old: 9056 Date old: 2005-02-22 18:07:56 RMD160 Hash old: A79998C78A8C2DA1B7C7504F593B56CD29A4E1C5
Application: c:\windows\options\cabs\hlink.dll Status: New added Version old: 5.2.3790.227 (srv03_qfe.040918 Size old: 68608 Date old: 2004-11-16 13:35:36 RMD160 Hash old: B29114D0F93512562AAB885D3B800BB075408CFD
Application: c:\windows\system\kb891711\q891711.dll Status: New added Version old: 4.10.2222 Size old: 4288 Date old: 2005-02-18 09:53:06 RMD160 Hash old: F6A69FFF80047E05801523445506CFC501AD6B30
And some files were changed.
As for this one: c:\windows\system\kb891711\kb891711.exe That one is now running all the time. I wonder whether others (either on W98SE or XP) see that same one.
Note: My file integrity checker NIS File Check checks several thousands of files. I still have to run my other file integrity checker ADinf32 pro, that checks ALL files.
Thanks ! Cheers, Jan. |
|
|
|
 SUMwarePremium join:2002-05-21 kudos:2 | I agree. On my box:
The following files are installed/updated -
[C:\WINDOWS\SYSTEM] hlink.dll 5.2.3790.22
[C:\WINDOWS\OPTIONS\CABS] HLINK.DLL 5.2.3790.22
[c:\windows\INF\QFE\W98] 888113UN.INF 891711UN.INF
[C:\WINDOWS\SYSTEM\KB891711] KB891711.EXE Q891711.DLL
KB891711.EXE is then run as a service at each boot. Several other registry changes are made. |
|
 | reply to SUMware Hi SUMware,
installed the 2 fixes yesterday on a Win98SE PC with IE6sp1, and everything is smooth.
FWIW, you could try to change your mouse. I had one time such a trouble, and it came from the mouse.
Charles. |
|
 BlackbirdBuilt for SpeedPremium join:2005-01-14 Fort Wayne, IN kudos:3 Reviews:
·Frontier Communi..
| reply to Jrb2 Oooops... my bad! I have a small utility that monitors the root, \Windows, and \Windows\System folders for any added files, but it ignores added folders and any contained files - so it missed the ones you noted. I erred in relying alone on its output during my quick check of installation changes, and forgot about checking for possible added folders. Indeed, they too were added/altered just as with your listing. Sorry for the confusion...  -- If God wanted us to work with electrons, He'd make them big enough to see... |
|
 BlackbirdBuilt for SpeedPremium join:2005-01-14 Fort Wayne, IN kudos:3 Reviews:
·Frontier Communi..
| reply to SUMware said by SUMware: KB891711.EXE is then run as a service at each boot. Several other registry changes are made. I'm guessing that the KB891711.exe being run as a service is how MS is validating cursors, animated cursors, and icons "on the fly" as their patch methodology, at least for Win98. It's still unclear to me why you had problems on your system, but it's possible that the patch uninstall isn't "clean", so that any problems that were created are not removed via Add/Remove. -- If God wanted us to work with electrons, He'd make them big enough to see... |
|
 SUMwarePremium join:2002-05-21 kudos:2 | reply to Goldengamego Thanks for the suggestion Charles. The mouse/cursor was fine till the patches were applied. Patch 891711 "modifying the way that cursors, animated cursor, and icon formats are validated prior to rendering". So it wouldn't surprise me if there was a connection.
I am considering reinstalling MS Intellimouse drivers after exhausting all other possibilities. I want to know what happened. Problem(s) is not registry based. So I'm hoping that it's not a shell problem. I've not detected any corrupt files after several SFC full C:\ drive scans, just the file changes detailed above.
Evidently this situation has not manifest itself elsewhere on other people's boxes. That's good news!
--------------
No problem Blackbird. Appreciate your input. |
|
 SUMwarePremium join:2002-05-21 kudos:2 | reply to Blackbird Exactly, that's why I manually deleted newly installed files, restored old files & registry, etc.
This is very irritating. |
|
 BlackbirdBuilt for SpeedPremium join:2005-01-14 Fort Wayne, IN kudos:3 Reviews:
·Frontier Communi..
1 edit | reply to SUMware said by SUMware: I am considering reinstalling MS Intellimouse drivers after exhausting all other possibilities. I want to know what happened. Problem(s) is not registry based. So I'm hoping that it's not a shell problem. I've not detected any corrupt files after several SFC full C:\ drive scans, just the file changes detailed above. Evidently this situation has not manifest itself elsewhere on other people's boxes. That's good news! My system uses Intellimouse 4.1 and the updates seem not to have interfered at all there. But I too wonder if you experienced some sort of corruption of the mouse software during patch install. I'm not sure how much (if any) of the mouse files would be brought back in your system restores, though obviously a full partition image-restore would recover things. So you might try an uninstall/reinstall of the Intellimouse software. I've done some heavy Googling, and so far, nobody else who patched has reported any real problems, let alone your specific mouse problem. The implication is that something got trashed on your system around the time of the install beyond the patches themselves, unique to your particular configuration. -- If God wanted us to work with electrons, He'd make them big enough to see... |
|
 SUMwarePremium join:2002-05-21 kudos:2 | Yep. I concur. It's a bit strange that system file checker shows no corrupt files. Or maybe I should be happy about that. So drivers themselves are probably not the culprit. Perhaps an interface somewhere is.
I now believe that something extraordinary occurred during my particular install (perhaps a download/connection hiccup) that is most likely not MS related.
In any event I'll run like this for another day, then try a mouse software reinstall.
In a total perspective, it's not a disaster. I'll deal with it. More poking and experimenting ahead.  |
|
 | reply to Goldengamego Is it really necessary for KB891711.exe to be running in the backround, because I like to keep a minimal of process' running? Can it be removed from running during start up without any conflicts? |
|
 BlackbirdBuilt for SpeedPremium join:2005-01-14 Fort Wayne, IN kudos:3 Reviews:
·Frontier Communi..
| I suppose you could always kill the service in System Configuration (Startup) and find out if Windows hiccups... . At a minimum, you will lose the essentially real-time validation of icon and cursor formats against the possible exploits MS is trying to block. Of course, if MS has "wired" the patch service directly between existing major code modules, your system may go belly up. 
If you really want the service to go away, you could always simply uninstall the 891711 patch completely via Add/Remove.
As I recall, there were none of these exploits known to exist in the wild at the time of the patch creation - but, as we all know, that can change in minutes. I do know that I'd not hit any risky websites or download much of anything with the patch disabled though... -- If God wanted us to work with electrons, He'd make them big enough to see... |
|
 | reply to Goldengamego said by Goldengamego:BTW: If you want to receive these emails from MS when a security bulletin is revised go to » profile.micoosft.com and subscribe to the "Microsoft Security Notification Service: Comprehensive Version" list. Don't ask why they didn't include these in with the standard bulletin emails, that apparently made to much sense  EDIT: http s »profile.microsoft.com
Doh:o -- Because Goldengamegod won't fit:p |
|