PDXPLT
join:2003-12-04
Banks, OR
| reply to flushls
Re: I'm don't need any 3.5 g I need 800-999 Mhz
said by flushls  :Really this does not help me one bit all my customers are NLOS and 3.5 does not work well in those kinds of conditions. So how about a 100+ mhz of sub 999. for us rural WISP's Just wait... there's another Notice of Proposed Rulemaking to let WISP's operate in TV Channels 5 to 51, if there's no TV station in the area using it.
At 6 MHz per TV channel, that's LOTS of spectrum below 700 MHz for use by rural WISP's, where typically there are few TV stations in operation. |
|
cmaenginsb
Premium,MVM
join:2001-03-19
Palmdale, CA
| reply to korym
I hear a lot of people talking about the "increased power", however without clarification as to whether this is TX power or EIRP there's little to say about this.
If it's only EIRP then the power limits are little better than what is in place now with PTmP rules and are close to PTmP rules. |
|
korym
Go Wisp's
ExMod 1999-03
join:1999-12-23
Richmond, VA
clubs: | reply to flushls
Actually, this might be helpful to you because of the increased power range. Just a thought. 
Regards,
Kory |
|
flushls
join:2004-11-02
Joyce, WA | Really this does not help me one bit all my customers are NLOS and 3.5 does not work well in those kinds of conditions. So how about a 100+ mhz of sub 999. for us rural WISP's
Flushls |
|
