  nightwalker Nightwalker
join:1999-08-07 Appleton, WI
4 edits | reply to oliphant Re: ATT seems to be winning the war...
Let's compare ATT and Vonage.
»www.vonage.com/corporate/press_index.php 05.01.2001 Vonage Launch 06.16.2003 Vonage has 30,000 Lines 09.23.2003 Vonage has 50,000 Lines 50,000 / 28 months = 1786 lines per month
CallVantage: 03.30.2004: CallVantage Launch 12.30.2004: CallVantage has 53,000 Lines 53,000 / 9 months = 5888 lines per month
It took only 8.5 months for ATT to hit 50K subscribers.
Vonage took over 27 months to hit the 50K mark.
-- »www.reverse.net |
|
  nameisonlyaname
@optonline.net
| Att can't win on an overpriced undermarketed service. If they plan on keeping the momentum they're gonna have to get into the real deal of not limiting minutes in the fine print and/or cutting the price, it's called competition. If you don't compete (like china does with dumping goods in the US, it's game-set-match for this former ma-bell tenticle) |
|
  oliphant I Have 8 Boobies Premium join:2004-11-26 Corona, CA | reply to nightwalker But Vonage was doing it when no one heard of residential VoIP. |
|
  GeekJedi RF is Good For You Premium join:2001-06-21 Mukwonago, WI clubs:
·CenturyLink
·VOIPo
·Vonage
·RoadRunner Cable
| reply to nightwalker OK, now for the REAL numbers...
How many subs THIS PAST YEAR?
In Vonage's first year, there was no one else doing VoIP. The fact is that almost nobody had heard of it.
FF to 2004. Lots more people know about it. Who do they go with?
Using your logic, we should measure sales of Motorola cell phones in 1992 and compare it to the sales of Nokia cell phones in 2005 and use that logic to determine who is superior! -- The goal of the broadcast engineer is to get all the meters on the transmitter to go as far to the right as possible!! |
|