 LoPhatPhuudPremium,VIP,MVM
join:2002-01-06
Albuquerque, NM
kudos:23
 ·Comcast
| reply to eburger68
Re: Pest Patrol: Claria Temporarily Removed What bothers me is that if a Vendor appeals they remove the detection pending the resolution of the appeal. Why not leave it in instead?
I can see it now; all major spyware/malware manufacturer's appeal to CA and soon PestPatrol will detect nothing!
--
"If you pick up a starving dog and make him prosperous, he will not bite you. This is the principal difference between a dog and a man."----- Mark Twain |
 SnowymIRC unix.ro UnderNetPremium
join:2003-04-05
Kailua, HI
kudos:5
·RoadRunner Cable
 ·Clearwire Wireless
| said by LoPhatPhuud:What bothers me is that if a Vendor appeals they remove the detection pending the resolution of the appeal. Why not leave it in instead? I'm all for 'innocent until proven guilty', but even humans don't always get out of jail pending investigation without some form of bail (penalty as it applies to software).
I don't believe remaining in software jail is contrary to good management.
CA may have learned something from the LS debacle, but not enough of the lesson to have benefitted from it. If it's to be believed, even LS has a better policy (whatever it means) than CA's de-list them all policy.
»Re: ASW Vendors in La-La Land |
TeMerc
join:2004-01-22
Phoenix, AZ | reply to LoPhatPhuud
I couldn't agree more.
I can already hear them beating feet to CA R&D over at New.Net, WhenU, 180Solutions, ISearch\IDownload, NaviSearch, CashBack, WindowsAd Service, Searchmaid, HotOffers, SlimShield, EliteToolbar, StopGuard, Guardbar, ClickSpring, CasinoPalazzo, Media Motor, ISTsvc, iWon, eXact Advertising, Ibis toolbar, and any other ,Potentially Offensive System slower on the market, asking for 'evaluation' so they too, can go undetected by CA\PP.
Just when you think it can't get much worse. 
--
Remember............You can NEVER be OVERPROTECTED!!»temerc.com/ |
