Search:  

 
 
   All ForumsHot TopicsGallery






how-to block ads


 
Forums » SBC Rejects Vonage 911 Collaboration » No Surprise...
Search Topic:
Uniqs:
44
Share Topic:
RSS topic:
toggle:
flat / full
normal / watch
Post a:
Post a:
what a shocking surprise! »
« SBC were not for your safety  
AuthorAll Replies

achuchma

join:2001-04-11
Tampa, FL

No Surprise...

Point fingers at Vonage or SBC, the point is that Vonage is working towards an E-911 solution and SBC does not want to help.

Please, the E-911 network was paid for and is maintained by copper users, not SBC, not the Federal Gov't, but by us.

I *do* feel that Vonage users (and other VoIP customers) need to contribute to the E-911 fund in order to get E-911 service. Once they do, SBC should not try to block Vonage's action to interface with E-911. Sadly, SBC will think of another reason to block the VoIP carriers if they start to put money in the E-911 pool.

SBC has been a poor loser for many things, this is just another one of their temper-tantrums.
--
Playing the Tuba isn't an art, it's an adventure! http://www.lakesidepride.org

ke4pym

join:2004-07-24
Charlotte, NC
·Verizon BroadbandA..
·Packet8
·RoadRunner Cable

Too bad you can't opt out of the E911 service fund. Personally, I don't want, need or care about having "E911", and as such, don't want to pay for it.

I pay plenty in taxes to cover police/fire services. If something happens and I can't verbalize where I am, oh well. I'm that much of a cheapskate.


calvoiper

join:2003-03-31
Belvedere Tiburon, CA

The "opt out" proposal ignores the fact that a major part of E-9-1-1 is providing emergency response to locations when the person reporting isn't the service subscriber.

Maybe your Aunt and her 3 kids are visiting, and when the fire breaks out at 3 am, only one of your cousins can reach a phone.

It's not all about YOU.

calvoiper
--
VoIP--the death knell of remaining voice monopolies!

achuchma

join:2001-04-11
Tampa, FL

said by calvoiper See Profile:

The "opt out" proposal ignores the fact that a major part of E-9-1-1 is providing emergency response to locations when the person reporting isn't the service subscriber.

Maybe your Aunt and her 3 kids are visiting, and when the fire breaks out at 3 am, only one of your cousins can reach a phone.

It's not all about YOU.
Not to mention if you are unable to speak in an emergency.

It would be hell to be having a fatal asthma attack or be choking with dispatch on the other end of the phone asking you where you live, but you can not tell them.
--
Playing the Tuba isn't an art, it's an adventure! http://www.lakesidepride.org


DSLTech

join:2000-12-30
San Jose, CA

reply to achuchma
Need to back up and take a good look at who and why.

Vonage entered the market without this E911 because they knew the only way they could push VoIP and get a head-start would be to begin with what they had at the time. They knew any 911 provision would take years to implement with the ILECs so they knowingly "began" the VoIP market.

Now that VoIP is becoming a true alternative and posing a real threat to traditional voice services, the issue of 911 has to be addressed.

SBC knows this and expected that Vonage would eventually be forced to hurry 911 service into its network in order to present itself as a true, safe alternative to regular voice.

I dont think SBC is going to want to help Vonage become a better competitor, even if this makes them look like the greedy little pigs they are. This is the American way and anyone who really needs 911 services should just go back to SBC and pay for a regular voice line. Nobody is forcing you to get Vonage service and endager your life, now are they? With this arguement, SBC can easily reflect accusations that it is insensitive.

The ILECs will do all they can to delay the arrival of VoIP, for reasons that should be obvious. I think eventually they will implement it but no Vonage is going to hurry them into it. Big guys dont take sh*t from little guys and this attempt by Vonage to force the hand with SBC is admireable but very naive.

What really bugs me is that we've allowed all these telecom companies to re-merge so now when one of them says no, there really is no other competitors you can go to in order to force the issue.

I think Vonage did the right thing in coming out with their VoIP service, even if it was sorta incomplete.If they were to have waited for E911, we'd all still be waiting for VoIP.
Wake up, fools.
Forums » SBC Rejects Vonage 911 Collaborationwhat a shocking surprise! »
« SBC were not for your safety  


Saturday, 05-Dec 20:10:23 Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Hosting by www.nac.net - DSL,Hosting & Co-lo | feedback | contact
over 10 years online! © 1999-2009 dslreports.com.
page compression OFF
Most commented news this week
· [163] Comcast Releasing Promised Usage Meter
· [147] Avast Antivirus Has Gone Mad
· [128] Comcast Makes NBC Universal Acquisition Official
· [110] The Bandwidth Hog Does Not Exist
· [105] Graduate Student Unveils Sprint's GPS Sharing With Feds
· [101] Google Invades ISP, OpenDNS Turf With Google Public DNS
· [85] FCC Ponders Moving From PSTN To IP Voice
· [81] Latest Consumer Reports Survey Not Kind To AT&T
· [80] New Bill Aims To Limit ETFs
· [74] Sprint Defuses GPS Privacy Media Bomb
Most people now reading
· False positive in Avast! or is it real? [Security]
· UPS - What do you people think happened? [General Questions]
· First commercial tool to crack BitLocker arrives (Updated) [Security]
· Windows 7 boot manager editing questions [Microsoft Help]
· 3.x Feral Druid - Bear Tanking Guide [World of Warcraft]
· RG Firmware update to VDSL2 this morning [AT&T U-verse]
· Wife might have to work in.... Iowa for a few months!!! [General Questions]
· delete [Security]
· [How to] Install Asterisk on an Asus WL-520GU router [VOIP Tech Chat]
· DNS options, what are YOU using? [TekSavvy]