Search:  

 
 
   All ForumsHot TopicsGallery






how-to block ads


 
Forums » Up and Running » Security » Security » Windows File Sharing: Facing The Mystery
Share Topic:
RSS topic:
toggle:
flat / full
normal / watch
Posting:
Post a:
Post a:
turning off Windows FW when running ZAP »
« This one is starting to wear me out.....  
Mele20
Premium
join:2001-06-05
Hilo, HI

Re: Windows File Sharing: Facing The Mystery

This article doesn't address file sharing between XP and 98SE boxes. Why not? I believe that is just as risky as the old 98 way. Most folks (home users at least) want to share between an old machine and a new one each running different OSes. I had to make my 98SE box totally vulnerable in order to share with the XP box. I had all bound to Netbeui but had to abandon that. This is an important issue but ignored in this article. Plus, I don't agree that Steve Gibson has sensationalized this issue. He is right on target. Much more so that the author of this article. I forgot once, after I made my 98SE box vulnerable, and used dial up instead of my usual cable modem behind a router connection. It took about 30 seconds for the 98SE box to be infected. So, I don't agree that Steve Gibson is a hysteric. I'll continue to read his site instead of articles like this one.
--
The first and foremost function of our jurors is to protect private citizens from a tyrannical and intrusive government...Jurors are the last line of defense for liberty. Thomas Jefferson 1789

Daniel
Premium,MVM
join:2000-06-26
Pleasanton, CA
clubs:

Re: Windows File Sharing: Facing The Mystery

said by Mele20 See Profile:

This article doesn't address file sharing between XP and 98SE boxes.
I think it does. There are essentially two systems for doing file sharing -- the 9x way, and the "direct hosting" way. As mentioned in the piece, if you have both enabled on the client and you try to contact another box for service, both types of connectivity are attempted.

That's how the old shares with the new.

If it's an XP box trying to share with a 98 machine, for example, and the XP box has NBT enabled, the XP box will send requests both to port 445 and to the NBT ports. Since the 98 box is not listening on 445, it will respond via the old method and communication will ensue.
--
dmiessler.com - grep understanding knowledge
Forums » Up and Running » Security » Securityturning off Windows FW when running ZAP »
« This one is starting to wear me out.....  


Sunday, 29-Nov 22:56:49 Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Hosting by www.nac.net - DSL,Hosting & Co-lo | feedback | contact
over 10 years online! © 1999-2009 dslreports.com.
page compression OFF
Most commented news this week
· [124] Time Warner Cable Fires Broadside At Broadcasters
· [112] New AT&T Ad Campaign Hits Back At Verizon
· [96] Apple Joins AT&T Verizon Snark Fest
· [87] New Bill Takes Aim At Higher Verizon ETFs
· [81] Weekend Open Thread
· [80] TiVo Sees Record Customer Losses
· [79] Verizon CEO: Hulu Will Be Dead Soon
· [69] In-Flight Internet Headed For Bumpy Landing?
· [63] Thanksgiving Open Thread
· [41] ICANN Slams DNS Redirection
Most people now reading
· Are GPS's better today? [General Questions]
· Is Easynews down? [Filesharing Software]
· [NFL] Week 12 Games Thread [Sports Chat]
· Grey Cup on the Web? [Canadian Chat]
· Windows 7 boot manager editing questions [Microsoft Help]
· [Newsgroups] Newzleech down? [Filesharing Software]
· [Equipment] Ubiquiti third party firmware for the M series Bulle [Wireless Service Providers]
· stopthetvtax [Canadian Chat]
· [How to] Install Asterisk on an Asus WL-520GU router [VOIP Tech Chat]