Search:  

 
 
   All ForumsHot TopicsGallery






how-to block ads


 
Forums » Verizon: Rules Schmules » Tough one
Share Topic:
RSS topic:
toggle:
flat / full
normal / watch
Post a:
Post a:
Franchise = graft »
« Verizon is right in this case  

calvoiper

join:2003-03-31
Belvedere Tiburon, CA

Re: Tough one

Those so called "public access channels" are just so much fluff to buy support for the cable company. Every little whiny interest group gets to produce its own cable show, and often the local cable company runs some "local newsmakers" show which just produces puff pieces about local politicos. It's just free publicity and fawning media about those politicians and interest groups with the pull to get on the show.

Here in Marin County, they pre-empt the last 5 minutes of each half hour of Headline News with a local blurb about this or that local politico. The @$$-kissing is so extreme that you can hardly hear the conversation for the smooching.

Local franchises don't benefit consumers--they keep out competition and increase the costs of distributing video services. They do help the local power structure, and since the cable companies get to pass along the costs and have fewer competitors, they play along.

calvoiper
--
VoIP--the death knell of remaining voice monopolies!

Karl Bode
News Guy
join:2000-03-02

Host:
Road Runner
PC gaming GAMES
PC gaming Tech

Re: Tough one

Again though, you're blaming the politicians for the failure of the agreements....

When Comcast had to go around forging new franchise agreements with each AT&T Broadband market, many towns used the leverage to get areas upgraded, schools and municipal buildings wired, etc......

Some just used it for a money-grab.

calvoiper

join:2003-03-31
Belvedere Tiburon, CA

Re: Tough one

To get areas upgraded, competition without the inhibitions of local franchises would be a better incentive. The only reason Comcast/ATT had to be leveraged into upgrades is that they felt relatively "safe" from competition because of their franchise agreements.

As for the wiring of school or muni buildings, the franchise agreement just serves as a back-door tax increase. These are worthy expenses, but they should be paid for through traditional means, not hidden costs buried in cable rates.

I remain convinced that franchise agreements serve only local political greed and to limit competition.

calvoiper
--
VoIP--the death knell of remaining voice monopolies!
Forums » Verizon: Rules SchmulesFranchise = graft »
« Verizon is right in this case  


Friday, 27-Nov 11:39:04 Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Hosting by www.nac.net - DSL,Hosting & Co-lo | feedback | contact
over 10 years online! © 1999-2009 dslreports.com.republican-creole
page compression OFF
Most commented news this week
· [116] Time Warner Cable Fires Broadside At Broadcasters
· [109] New AT&T Ad Campaign Hits Back At Verizon
· [95] Apple Joins AT&T Verizon Snark Fest
· [87] New Bill Takes Aim At Higher Verizon ETFs
· [70] TiVo Sees Record Customer Losses
· [68] In-Flight Internet Headed For Bumpy Landing?
· [59] Thanksgiving Open Thread
· [38] EFF Wages War On Fine Print
· [38] ICANN Slams DNS Redirection
· [36] Senators Want ACTA Made Public
Most people now reading
· Newegg Black Friday Sale started [Users Find Hot Deals]
· Only firefox accesses Internet? [Security]
· SSD [Computer Hardware Discussion/Reviews]
· 3.x Feral Druid - Bear Tanking Guide [World of Warcraft]
· Windows 7 boot manager editing questions [Microsoft Help]
· Bell Response to PIPEDA Request [TekSavvy]
· Connecting to Google Voice Via SIP [VOIP Tech Chat]
· [Newsgroups] Newzleech down? [Filesharing Software]
· HOW-TO: QoS and Tomato (fixes "choppy voice") [MagicJack]
· So we need a legitimate reason to use a lot of bandwidth? [TekSavvy]