Search:  

 
 
   All ForumsHot TopicsGallery






how-to block ads


 
Forums » Cincinnati: BPL Hotspot » Gee, talk about sugar coating it......
Search Topic:
Share Topic:
RSS topic:
toggle:
flat / full
normal / watch
Post a:
Post a:
Cincy? »
« BPL and Wendy's Chili Controversy  
AuthorAll Replies

N3EVL

join:2004-12-13
Shrewsbury, MA

reply to JKrums
Re: Gee, talk about sugar coating it......

said by JKrums See Profile:

BPL has, in all cases I know of, not caused any harmfull interference with HAM Radio operators. True, the potential exists, but welcome to any technology using RF.
I'd be interested in knowing which specific trials you're referring to. The cases of actual interference have been well documented as has the lack of action by the FCC and the BPL industry's sad attempts at denial.

I'm puzzled by your last sentence - are you implying that BPL's potential for causing interference is something we (legitimate spectrum users) should just meekly accept? If so, what is the basis of this statement?

revuney

join:2003-03-22
Somerville, MA

Honestly, I see the Hams/ARRL being shut out on this eventually. The BPL industry has or will have better legislators, and they might just force a spectrum share or have the FCC ignore the hams.

Personally I think the hams are a bit "The sky is falling" about this, but at the same time, they are getting shafted just a bit...


rf_engineer

join:2003-08-04
USA

said by revuney See Profile:

Honestly, I see the Hams/ARRL being shut out on this eventually. The BPL industry has or will have better legislators, and they might just force a spectrum share or have the FCC ignore the hams.
FCC Commissioner Powell was their ace in the pocket. He's gone now. For the hams to get shut out, it would require regulation changes that would cause the US to be in violation of international treaties. It would also put in danger other services in the HF radio bands. But the FCC can't do this since the NTIA pushed the FCC to prohibit BPL in several aeronautical bands. In essence the FCC would be giving primary status to something they already acknowledged would be detrimental to the services in the HF band.

Personally I think the hams are a bit "The sky is falling" about this, but at the same time, they are getting shafted just a bit...
It depends if the meteorite is heading for your house or the neighbor's
Forums » Cincinnati: BPL HotspotCincy? »
« BPL and Wendy's Chili Controversy  


Thursday, 26-Nov 18:12:25 Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Hosting by www.nac.net - DSL,Hosting & Co-lo | feedback | contact
over 10 years online! © 1999-2009 dslreports.com.
page compression OFF
Most commented news this week
· [109] New AT&T Ad Campaign Hits Back At Verizon
· [106] Time Warner Cable Fires Broadside At Broadcasters
· [95] Apple Joins AT&T Verizon Snark Fest
· [87] New Bill Takes Aim At Higher Verizon ETFs
· [69] TiVo Sees Record Customer Losses
· [61] In-Flight Internet Headed For Bumpy Landing?
· [42] Thanksgiving Open Thread
· [37] ICANN Slams DNS Redirection
· [34] Senators Want ACTA Made Public
· [34] Despite Billions In USF Fees, U.S. Libraries Lack Bandwidth
Most people now reading
· I'll Just Unplug That... [No, I Will Not Fix Your #@$!! Computer]
· Connecting to Google Voice Via SIP [VOIP Tech Chat]
· 3.x Feral Druid - Bear Tanking Guide [World of Warcraft]
· SSD [Computer Hardware Discussion/Reviews]
· So we need a legitimate reason to use a lot of bandwidth? [TekSavvy]
· HOW-TO: QoS and Tomato (fixes "choppy voice") [MagicJack]
· Newegg Black Friday Sale started [Users Find Hot Deals]
· Slow speeds in the evenings [TekSavvy]
· Rogers Rocket Stick [Rogers]
· persistent connection to qw-in-f113.1e100.net on boot [Security]