  ColdFiltered
join:2005-01-25 Atlanta, GA
| reply to pnh102 Re: Sterilize and Jail the Parents...
Does anyone remember the court decision a few months back against a drug-addict women? The court ordered her to not have anymore children as the many she already had were in foster-care because she, obviously, couldn't take care of them.
I'd have gutted her as my 'court' decision. We have to have a license to drive and fish, but not one to breed. |
|
 BosstonesOwn
join:2002-12-15 Everett, MA clubs:
·Comcast
| said by ColdFiltered :Does anyone remember the court decision a few months back against a drug-addict women? The court ordered her to not have anymore children as the many she already had were in foster-care because she, obviously, couldn't take care of them. I'd have gutted her as my 'court' decision. We have to have a license to drive and fish, but not one to breed. Don't forget to hunt, even to buy a gun which is in the constitution as a right. -- "It's always funny until someone gets hurt......and then it's absolutely friggin' hysterical!" |
|
 lawrence171 Evilly Yours - Evilness
join:2001-12-24 Canada
| reply to ColdFiltered Ugh... what right does that woman have to make another suffer endlessly because of her own stupidity/incompetence?
The court makes decision base on what's best for society and/or the individuals involved. Can you honestly tell me that such a mother will give birth to healthy babies? |
|
  Pz_
join:2001-03-31 Brownsburg, IN clubs:
| reply to ColdFiltered You know, I've thought for a long time we should have a breeding license. On paper it looks great. If you are a competent adult with a safe and nurturing environment for a child, then you are allowed to create one.
Then the governement steps in and starts corrupting everything. Before you know, we have Half-Life 2 on our hands. Only we don't get a Gordon Freeman.  |
|
  pnh102 Reptiles Are Cuddly And Pretty Premium join:2002-05-02 Mount Airy, MD
·Comcast
| reply to lawrence171 said by lawrence171 :Ugh... what right does that woman have to make another suffer endlessly because of her own stupidity/incompetence? As long as the law allows for such stupid lawsuits to proceed, they will never end. I think if we change the presumption of guilt that goes with civil lawsuits (e.g, the idiot would have to prove Vonage screwed up as opposed to Vonage having to prove that it didn't screw up) we would see a significant drop in the amount of money paid out in damages. -- Hey Fast Eddie... you're next! |
|