 GhostDoggy
join:2005-05-11 Duluth, GA
| reply to Derch Re: Sounds good...
said by Derch :Doesn't matter what the end says, everyone knows that ISP's like to drag their feet when it comes to deployment. Why do you blame ISPs? Usually the ISPs are reselling something being whoelsaled to them, and its them (wholesalers) dragging their feet. |
|
  ronpin Imagine Reality
join:2002-12-06 Nirvana
·AT&T Southwest
| reply to DaSneaky1D
 What's left at 12,000 feet? |
''' |
|
  DaSneaky1D one wall to block them all Premium,MVM join:2001-03-29 The Lou
·Charter Pipeline
| reply to Derch You're right, fiber is a better solution. I was speaking more so from the standpoint of CLEC's
A twisted-pair local loop is much cheaper than a "T1" type local loop. When there is equipment that can offer much faster data rates over cheaper mediums, there is a huge cost savings. -- ] :: my trivial ramblings :: [ |
|
  Derch Premium join:2004-10-16 Tulsa, OK | reply to DaSneaky1D I take back a little of what I said. I bet SBC might use VDSL2 rather than deploying fiber and then VDSL to residential houses. But, in the long term, fiber is always best. |
|
  DaSneaky1D one wall to block them all Premium,MVM join:2001-03-29 The Lou
·Charter Pipeline
| reply to Derch Not when it can potentially save them money in the end. SDSL is a great technology to replace data-only local loops. It's cheaper (Bell loop) and provides the same service. -- ] :: my trivial ramblings :: [ |
|
  Derch Premium join:2004-10-16 Tulsa, OK | reply to starstuff Doesn't matter what the end says, everyone knows that ISP's like to drag their feet when it comes to deployment. |
|
  starstuff Fly By Wire Premium join:2001-12-05 Mcallen, TX
| reply to jmcd088 Read to the end... it reads Ready for immediate deployment, the new VDSL2 Recommendation (ITU-T G.993.2), will continue to foster competitive global markets for high-speed equipment, assuring a level playing field for developers and vendors.
I wonder if it is true. |
|