Search:  

 
 
   All ForumsHot TopicsGallery






how-to block ads


 
Forums » Inside SBC's $15 DSL Deal » Old Story, new Technology
Share Topic:
RSS topic:
toggle:
flat / full
normal / watch
Post a:
Post a:
Are they really losing money? »
« DSL is a small picture  
Biskit

join:2003-02-07
Fenton, MO

Re: Old Story, new Technology

So.....Since they run a vertical service on the line that basically cost them nothing means? They should give it to you for free, right?

"The fact that prices havent fallen is proof they are soaking there customers"

Isnt that what the article is about, falling prices? Why shouldnt investors be worried, whether it is fleecing or not, isnt profits why you invest in any company??!

oliphant
I Have 8 Boobies
Premium
join:2004-11-26
Corona, CA

Re: Old Story, new Technology

I'm sorry, who is giving away free DSL? Investors are ALWAYS worried, no matter what a business does.

If they raised their prices investors would be worried about losing customers to competitors. If they drop the price they worry about margin.

This is nothing new. The article should be about how investors put their money in businesses they really don't understand, then freak 'cause they don't understand it.
--
Life is good without the headache of Comcrap HSI

Sebastian
Premium
join:2000-12-22
New Haven, CT

said by Biskit See Profile:

So.....Since they run a vertical service on the line that basically cost them nothing means? They should give it to you for free, right?

"The fact that prices havent fallen is proof they are soaking there customers"

Isnt that what the article is about, falling prices? Why shouldnt investors be worried, whether it is fleecing or not, isnt profits why you invest in any company??!
on my cell phone i get caller-id, 5-way calling, callwaiting, voicemail, and many more at no extra charge.. try adding those service to your land-line. it'll cost an arm and leg.

my land line phone cost $50 a month with no long distance, and with just a caller-id.. pretty basic for $50. my cell phone however cost $60/m and i can call anywhere i feel like it for no extra charge.. time for the Bells to lower prices or everyone might switch their land-line phones for wireless..
--
BBR Gaming Server Admin.
gaming.broadbandreports.com, cstrike-planet.com

tsu9

join:2001-08-17
Wheeling, IL

Re: Old Story, new Technology

Cellphones include those "standard" as a means to justify a substantially higher premium price. It isn't the only thing that does this, but it does attribute.
cptmiles
Premium
join:2004-04-22
Swayzee, IN
Don't forget that most of those big companies that own the landline owns that cell phone service as well. No one is clean.
fiberguy
My views are my own.
Premium
join:2005-05-20

on my cell phone i get caller-id, 5-way calling, callwaiting, voicemail, and many more at no extra charge.. try adding those service to your land-line. it'll cost an arm and leg.
Except for Caller ID, and Voice Mail (which is usually resold), you mentioned services that they WANT you to use. 3-way calling, call waiting, and some of these other services make you use more minutes which means more profits.

Comparing the cell phone model to landline services is not a great example.

But I agree, if I were investing in a company that was not trying to get the most $$ from each customer, I would think twice about my investment.

Also, the $14.95 service is a loss in profit. Please read the article again and pay attention to the WHOLE thing and not just what makes people happy.

Like I have said in other forums, SBD is doing this to draw custoemrs away from Cable who is on thier butts to get them as a captive audience. A captive customer is easier to migrate into higher charges.

Did anyone also notice how they stated that after the $14.95 promotion is over it reverts to the *$30.00* monthly charge? Also, SBC is not being honest on this "prmotion" as they will offer this to anyone who asks for it without argument and over the phone.

Disagree if you want, but SBC won't be running this promotion as loose as they currently are for long. I don't think cable has much to worry about with this.. it's all the balance of the business coming to play.. competition, you know? I know most of you can't see this because it's not government forcing the price drop. However, the last thing I want is either cable or telephone to go under.. because what are you left with? NO CHOICE!
Forums » Inside SBC's $15 DSL DealAre they really losing money? »
« DSL is a small picture  


Saturday, 05-Dec 18:22:31 Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Hosting by www.nac.net - DSL,Hosting & Co-lo | feedback | contact
over 10 years online! © 1999-2009 dslreports.com.
page compression OFF
Most commented news this week
· [163] Comcast Releasing Promised Usage Meter
· [147] Avast Antivirus Has Gone Mad
· [128] Comcast Makes NBC Universal Acquisition Official
· [104] Graduate Student Unveils Sprint's GPS Sharing With Feds
· [104] The Bandwidth Hog Does Not Exist
· [101] Google Invades ISP, OpenDNS Turf With Google Public DNS
· [85] FCC Ponders Moving From PSTN To IP Voice
· [81] Latest Consumer Reports Survey Not Kind To AT&T
· [80] New Bill Aims To Limit ETFs
· [74] Sprint Defuses GPS Privacy Media Bomb
Most people now reading
· Wife might have to work in.... Iowa for a few months!!! [General Questions]
· False positive in Avast! or is it real? [Security]
· First commercial tool to crack BitLocker arrives (Updated) [Security]
· 3.x Feral Druid - Bear Tanking Guide [World of Warcraft]
· UPS - What do you people think happened? [General Questions]
· DNS options, what are YOU using? [TekSavvy]
· RG Firmware update to VDSL2 this morning [AT&T U-verse]
· [How to] Install Asterisk on an Asus WL-520GU router [VOIP Tech Chat]
· Windows 7 boot manager editing questions [Microsoft Help]
· Yahoo redirect to malware site [Security]