Search:  

 
 
   All ForumsHot TopicsGallery






how-to block ads


 
Forums » Aurora Adware & Underage Porn? » Well, well, well......
 
Search Topic:
  Share Topic:
RSS topic:
 toggle:
flat / full
normal / watch
Post a:
Post a:
AuthorAll Replies

moonpuppy

join:2000-08-21
Glen Burnie, MD
·Verizon Online DSL

reply to Christopher001
Re: Well, well, well......

said by Christopher001:

Actually, Advoc8 is right! There have been no studies done that show that child porn is actually harmful to the children that are used in it. The only study that was actually done and published on it in this century by the Danish, I believe, actually came to the OPPOSITE conclusion, that there is no damage to children from seeing porn, having sex with an adult, or having sex with other children.
Again, post said study or I call BS.


illbite

@12.163.x.x

All right, I'll chip in, but by no means it doesn't mean I condone this, but you asked for a study.

Search for the original text of:

"A meta-analytic examination of assumed properties of child sexual abuse using college samples."

By:
Rind B, Tromovitch P, Bauserman R.
Department of Psychology, Temple University

The data supported their findings that when the encounters were consensual there was no more damage to the child than with a 'normal' sex encounter and in some cases it even had a POSITIVE effect on the child in question.

The APA published it on a bulletin. However the ensuing uproar and even Congress involvement comdemning the study results because they "disagreed" with their findings caused the APA to issue a formal detraction letter apologizing for having published such article. They couldn't refute the data thought, just got all pissy about the findings going contrary to their moral beliefs.

moonpuppy

join:2000-08-21
Glen Burnie, MD
·Verizon Online DSL

Retraction of study = "we were wrong, sorry."

If the APA can't stand behind their studies, then they must not have a leg to stand on.

Also, how can we expect a child to be mature enough to have sex but not to drive (until they are 16), hold a job (until they are 18 or earlier with PARENTAL CONSENT), or drink alcohol? Just because they can, doesn't mean they should.

I read that study and find a few of their conclusions a bit off center. I wonder how many people would allow their 12 year old child to have sex with a 30 year old adult.

And why is it the "anonymous" posters are the ones promoting adult/child sex?
Forums » Aurora Adware & Underage Porn?

Most commented news this week
· [173] East Coast Verizon Workers Authorize Strike
· [166] Is AT&T Hinting At Usage-Based Pricing This Fall?
· [149] Time Warner Cable Using Fine Print To Foist Caps On Customers
· [125] Is Broadband A Civil Right?
· [111] The Great Landline Exodus Continues
· [97] Update Your Browser, Dummy
· [82] What's Your Favorite Newsgroup Provider?
· [79] Comcast Hit With Another Throttling Lawsuit
· [73] Google's Cerf: Baby Bells Act Like Tots Having Tantrums
· [71] NY AG Will Sue Comcast If They Don't Pretend To Fight Child Porn
Friday, 25-Jul
23:20:45
Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Hosting by www.nac.net - DSL,Hosting & Co-lo | feedback | contact
8th year online! © 1999-2008 dslreports.com.
page compression OFF