Search:  

 
 
   All ForumsHot TopicsGallery






how-to block ads


 
Forums » Aurora Adware & Underage Porn? » Well, well, well......
Share Topic:
RSS topic:
toggle:
flat / full
normal / watch
Post a:
Post a:
moonpuppy

join:2000-08-21
Glen Burnie, MD
·Verizon Online DSL

Re: Well, well, well......

said by Christopher001:

Actually, Advoc8 is right! There have been no studies done that show that child porn is actually harmful to the children that are used in it. The only study that was actually done and published on it in this century by the Danish, I believe, actually came to the OPPOSITE conclusion, that there is no damage to children from seeing porn, having sex with an adult, or having sex with other children.
Again, post said study or I call BS.

illbite

@12.163.x.x

Re: Well, well, well......

All right, I'll chip in, but by no means it doesn't mean I condone this, but you asked for a study.

Search for the original text of:

"A meta-analytic examination of assumed properties of child sexual abuse using college samples."

By:
Rind B, Tromovitch P, Bauserman R.
Department of Psychology, Temple University

The data supported their findings that when the encounters were consensual there was no more damage to the child than with a 'normal' sex encounter and in some cases it even had a POSITIVE effect on the child in question.

The APA published it on a bulletin. However the ensuing uproar and even Congress involvement comdemning the study results because they "disagreed" with their findings caused the APA to issue a formal detraction letter apologizing for having published such article. They couldn't refute the data thought, just got all pissy about the findings going contrary to their moral beliefs.
moonpuppy

join:2000-08-21
Glen Burnie, MD
·Verizon Online DSL

Re: Well, well, well......

Retraction of study = "we were wrong, sorry."

If the APA can't stand behind their studies, then they must not have a leg to stand on.

Also, how can we expect a child to be mature enough to have sex but not to drive (until they are 16), hold a job (until they are 18 or earlier with PARENTAL CONSENT), or drink alcohol? Just because they can, doesn't mean they should.

I read that study and find a few of their conclusions a bit off center. I wonder how many people would allow their 12 year old child to have sex with a 30 year old adult.

And why is it the "anonymous" posters are the ones promoting adult/child sex?
Forums » Aurora Adware & Underage Porn?


Friday, 04-Dec 01:31:56 Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Hosting by www.nac.net - DSL,Hosting & Co-lo | feedback | contact
over 10 years online! © 1999-2009 dslreports.com.republican-creole
page compression OFF
Most commented news this week
· [162] Comcast Releasing Promised Usage Meter
· [140] Avast Antivirus Has Gone Mad
· [104] Graduate Student Unveils Sprint's GPS Sharing With Feds
· [99] Comcast Makes NBC Universal Acquisition Official
· [83] Google Invades ISP, OpenDNS Turf With Google Public DNS
· [81] Latest Consumer Reports Survey Not Kind To AT&T
· [70] Baltimore To Ban Lazy Cable Installs
· [64] Broadband Killed The Game Console
· [64] Sprint Defuses GPS Privacy Media Bomb
· [58] FCC Ponders Moving From PSTN To IP Voice
Most people now reading
· False positive in Avast! or is it real? [Security]
· Warrior tank seem underpowered these days [World of Warcraft]
· Evading throttling with uTP / uTorrent 1.9a [TekSavvy]
· Maximizing Rogue DPS for ToC/ToGC (3.x) [World of Warcraft]
· Linux is terrorist - according to MS... [All Things Unix]
· What the heck is going on in SoCal - Part 3 [Road Runner]
· [Rant] Disrespect of PTO [Rants, Raves, and Praise]
· [Business] how to bridge a smc 8014 business class modem [Comcast HSI]
· [TWC] Audio/Video outage in Brooklyn [Time Warner Cable TV/Voice]
· Windows 7 boot manager editing questions [Microsoft Help]