Search:  

 
 
   All ForumsHot TopicsGallery






how-to block ads


 
Forums » Aurora Adware & Underage Porn? » Well, well, well......
Search Topic:
Share Topic:
RSS topic:
toggle:
flat / full
normal / watch
Post a:
Post a:
AuthorAll Replies

moonpuppy

join:2000-08-21
Glen Burnie, MD
·Verizon Online DSL

reply to illbite
Re: Well, well, well......

Retraction of study = "we were wrong, sorry."

If the APA can't stand behind their studies, then they must not have a leg to stand on.

Also, how can we expect a child to be mature enough to have sex but not to drive (until they are 16), hold a job (until they are 18 or earlier with PARENTAL CONSENT), or drink alcohol? Just because they can, doesn't mean they should.

I read that study and find a few of their conclusions a bit off center. I wonder how many people would allow their 12 year old child to have sex with a 30 year old adult.

And why is it the "anonymous" posters are the ones promoting adult/child sex?


illbite

@12.163.x.x

reply to moonpuppy
All right, I'll chip in, but by no means it doesn't mean I condone this, but you asked for a study.

Search for the original text of:

"A meta-analytic examination of assumed properties of child sexual abuse using college samples."

By:
Rind B, Tromovitch P, Bauserman R.
Department of Psychology, Temple University

The data supported their findings that when the encounters were consensual there was no more damage to the child than with a 'normal' sex encounter and in some cases it even had a POSITIVE effect on the child in question.

The APA published it on a bulletin. However the ensuing uproar and even Congress involvement comdemning the study results because they "disagreed" with their findings caused the APA to issue a formal detraction letter apologizing for having published such article. They couldn't refute the data thought, just got all pissy about the findings going contrary to their moral beliefs.

moonpuppy

join:2000-08-21
Glen Burnie, MD
·Verizon Online DSL

reply to Christopher001
said by Christopher001:

Actually, Advoc8 is right! There have been no studies done that show that child porn is actually harmful to the children that are used in it. The only study that was actually done and published on it in this century by the Danish, I believe, actually came to the OPPOSITE conclusion, that there is no damage to children from seeing porn, having sex with an adult, or having sex with other children.
Again, post said study or I call BS.
Forums » Aurora Adware & Underage Porn?


Thursday, 10-Dec 11:41:58 Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Hosting by www.nac.net - DSL,Hosting & Co-lo | feedback | contact
over 10 years online! © 1999-2009 dslreports.com.
page compression OFF
Most commented news this week
· [200] Sprint Sued For Distracted Driving Death
· [125] AT&T Launching New 24 Mbps U-Verse Tier
· [82] 3G Network Test Says AT&T Is Tops
· [72] Mediacom Unveils 105 Mbps Pricing
· [70] AT&T Hints At Usage-Based iPhone Data Pricing
· [66] Sprint Poised For A Turnaround?
· [66] WPA Cracker: Test WPA-PSK Networks In 20 Minutes
· [51] The Future Of Wi-Fi Is Bright
· [47] Site Leaks Yahoo, Verizon Fed Data Share Pricing
· [45] Microwaving Your Innards Is Not 'Extreme'
Most people now reading
· IMG 1.7 (IMG Updates and Discussion) [Verizon FIOS TV]
· Cross Server Dungeon Experience [World of Warcraft]
· Windows 7 boot manager editing questions [Microsoft Help]
· Icecrown 5-man strats [World of Warcraft]
· Battered Hilt Delimma [World of Warcraft]
· malware has been found hidden inside an Ubuntu screensaver [Security]
· 60GB would only last us two days! [TekSavvy]
· Lawyers Claim Palin Hack Suspect's PC Had Spyware [Security]
· So what's your impressions of Lich King so far.... [World of Warcraft]
· [game] CG6 - Gunslinger - Day 1 [Pub Games]