how-to block ads
|
Italia3
Sweet, Succulent, Satisfying
Premium
join:2005-06-14
N.W. TN
| Interesting.....
Probably b/c consumers does not consider this a wave of the future due to lack of speed. Or perhaps it is not widely advertised. It is a new concept to me. You just don't hear much of BPL. It makes sense since the powerlines are already installed. It is making more use out of something that already exists.  | |
packetscan
Premium
join:2004-10-19
Bridgeport, CT
clubs: | Google..
Why did you invest in BPL..
Ok well i guess you are allowed one mistake.. | |
ArchAngel21x
MacFan Pro
Premium
join:2001-10-28
Lincoln, NE | Ok well i guess you are allowed can afford one mistake.. | |
rf_engineer
join:2003-08-04
USA
| reply to Italia3
said by Italia3  :Probably b/c consumers does not consider this a wave of the future due to lack of speed. Or perhaps it is not widely advertised. It is a new concept to me. You just don't hear much of BPL. It makes sense since the powerlines are already installed. It is making more use out of something that already exists. It may make sense since the powerlines are already installed, but the powerline itself is a small portion of what is needed. You need feedpoint equipment to feed the signal into the lines, repeaters to regenerate the signal, and way to get the traffic back to the Internet such as fiber or telco facilities. BPL has more severe distance limitations than cable and dsl. While the thought of power lines everywhere would make one think BPL could be everywhere, it isn't like having a real broadband medium like fiber, coax, or twisted pair.
You don't hear much of BPL because the most press it gets is when an equipment manufacturer makes a press release. When news comes out, like the recent San Diego BPL system, it's usually a small trial and not a commercial rollout. Ironically the interference issues with BPL have created alot of press.
BPL has been in testing and development as long as cable and dsl have been in production. But the physical medium BPL uses has more limitations that both cable and dsl. If it weren't for the ubiquity of power lines, BPL would have been written off years ago, but as I mention above the prevalence of power lines gives BPL a perceived advantage that is false and misleading. | |
bplnow
| reply to ArchAngel21x
Re: Interesting...why some big companies like BPL
re: A New Outlet for Broadband
By Eric Hellweg July 18, 2005
As several companies conduct experiments using electrical wiring in the home to provide broadband Internet access, the phrase "plugged in" may take on a whole new meaning.
Currently, most power lines are "dumb" conduits, used to transfer electric current. But they're actually capable of carrying data as well. Therein lies the excitement behind the emerging field of broadband over power lines, or BPL.
Last week, Houston, Texas-based energy company CenterPoint and IBM announced a trial run that will provide BPL service to 220 homes in the greater Houston area. And two weeks ago Current Communications Group, a Maryland-based company offering broadband over power lines, announced that it had secured $100 million in venture financing from Google, Hearst, and Goldman Sachs. Meanwhile, other BPL trials are currently underway in Manhattan, Cincinnati, and parts of North Carolina.
So, in the wake of the Supreme Court's recent decision that cable companies don't have to share their lines with other ISPs (the "BrandX Decision"), consumers around the country may soon have a third choice (in addition to cable and DSL) for getting broadband.
BPL technology has been in the works for more than five years, but several factors have come together recently to speed up its commercial viability. In October 2004, the Federal Communications Commission announced its support for standards for the technology -- an important step. Also, several states, including Texas and California, are developing their own legislation to iron out remaining regulatory issues among utilities and BPL.
Meanwhile, on the technology side, increases in chip speed have combined with cost reductions for key components, such as adapters and chips, to pave the way for more economical deployments of the technology.
"We've been chomping at the bit with BPL," says Ray Blair, vice president of IBM's BPL initiatives. "Now we can run."
Others are also enthusiastic. "We're finally seeing the pieces are all in place," says Kevin Brand, vice president of product management for Earthlink. The Internet provider currently has several small BPL trials around the country and Brand says subscriber feedback so far has been "very positive."
It's not just Internet providers and their consumers who could benefit from BPL. Utility companies themselves are bullish on it.
"We're looking to take our grid into the 21st century," says Don Cortez, vice president of operations support at Houston-based CenterPoint Energy. "BPL gives us the possibility of monitoring the different points on the grid and letting us know well before something happens if something is wrong. Right now we have no way to see what's going on."
With BPL, utilities can monitor line usage and problems, as well as read meters without dispatching a technician.
On the consumer side, BPL offers some potential advantages over broadband alternatives. For one, customers could use the technology to turn down air conditioning or make sure the coffee pot is off while they're away from home.
"When every power outlet becomes a communications tool, you can have that kind of intelligence in every room," says Cortez. CenterPoint will decide what type of commercial roll-out to offer its customers by September, according to Cortez.
BPL technology also provides a broadband option that may be simpler and faster. Current Communications Group has a BPL-based program running in Cincinnati, with subscribers "in the thousands," according to Kevin Kushman, CCG vice president of corporate development.
The company offers a three-megabit-per-second broadband package, comparable to many cable-based broadband offerings, for $35 per month. It's not price that Current is competing on, though, says Kushman, but the fact that, with BPL, the uploading speed is the same as the downloading speed, around 3 megabits per second.
In other broadband mediums, the upstream speed can be considerably slower than downstream. Further, Kushman says their BPL customers like not having to deal with a router. The company gives subscribers one free adapter with the service, and sells additional adapters for $30 each.
Wes Warnock, a spokesperson for SBC Communications, the largest telephone-line-based broadband provider in the country, won't comment on the IBM/CenterPoint trial, but says that SBC's consumers are satisfied with the 416 K bits per second upstream speed of DSL. "Our feedback shows it serves them well," he says.
Meanwhile, other companies are plugging away. "We're close to seeing large-scale deployments of BPL," says Earthlink's Brand.
Eric Hellweg is an award-winning writer and editor who has covered business and technology for over 10 years. | |
|
