guitarzan
Premium
join:2004-05-04
Skytop, PA
 ·epix
| reply to zemus
Re: Wrong idea
said by zemus  :Why is this important? well What if on the flip side We had a Chinese company in the US who had information on a real criminal, but for one reason or another they refuse to give it to us based on some moral standing that only applies to them. See this ladder swings both ways. No, disagreeing with policy doesn't not give you or anyone the right to ignore it. What you described as the "get out of jail free card".Is more known as diplomatic immunity. So this ladder does not quite swing both ways.These foreign criminals are givin' free reign in the U.S. Then the proper agency's here, tuck them into first class seats making sure they are comfy and have a safe plain ride home.
--
Bass....the glue of rhythm and harmony...the heartbeat of the band.! Shaking the earth with deep,sonorous vibrations.The dark ominous thunder of an approching storm. |
|
zemus
join:2001-01-13
Brooklyn, NY
| reply to ross
So who decide what's right and wrong? moral and immoral? hmm I like to think it would evolve through civil protest and these decisions are not made by a CEO in yahoo. I don't support China's policies however disagree with a law does not mean you do not have to obey it. Take the DMCA or the patriot act. i mean god damn these are stupid laws if u can even call it that... Which btw are in every way as bad as some of China's policies... Yet as civilized people we should form protests and peaceful resolutions but still obey the laws as long as it is in effect. Don't forget we still have segregation in certain small areas of the US. and only 50 years ago schools are separated black and white. These crimes are 100 times worst than anything you can fine in China who's government is less than 90 years old. 90 years after the US government was form we still had slavery. geez. That was a long tangent, back to the point. I neither want yahoo to be my moral compass nor do I want they to break any laws regardless of which country base on what they think is right or wrong mainly because their idea of right /wrong may not be the same as mine and morality is subjective, the law is not.
Why is this important? well What if on the flip side We had a Chinese company in the US who had information on a real criminal, but for one reason or another they refuse to give it to us based on some moral standing that only applies to them. See this ladder swings both ways. No, disagreeing with policy doesn't not give you or anyone the right to ignore it. |
|
ross
join:2000-08-16
·Digizip
| reply to zemus
Business is business, eh? Well, helping arrest and facillitate prosecution of political dissidents in a country where such non-violent opposition to the state can mean a long prison term, as in this case, or even death is not the business of Yahoo!.
A rat is a rat, unless it is a particularly large odiferous RAT, like Yahoo! has just become. If the bottom line is their only concern, they are not acting responsibly. |
|
