 fiberguy My views are my own. Premium join:2005-05-20 | reply to sbrook Re: [ Extreme] Rogers e-mail, infringing copyright
gotchya... duh, I should have read again where it came from abuse@rogers.... thanks |
|
  cynicaltoo
@speakeasy.n
| reply to PuZo10 dude. perhaps you should ignore and immediately delete such an email. How are they going to confirm that _YOU_ actually got it and read it, except if you reply. I'm not a lawyer so check with one, don't take my word. But I think it's all about plausible deniability. Of course you also want to take steps to ensure that the jackbooted ones won't find anything if they come to visit.
"You sent me an email telling me to cease and desist doing what? Funny, I don't have any recollection of seeing any such email, perhaps it was deleted by my spam filter at the time, assuming of course I actually received it. " |
|
  corster Premium join:2002-02-23 Ottawa, ON clubs:  | reply to PuZo10 delete it.
besides, if rogers DID hand over your identity (which they didn't), you can sue them for it.. |
|
 PiedPiper1
join:2005-11-12 | reply to sbrook hello all for torrent problems try port 720 i work for rogers see if this helps at all. |
|
  Wheemer
@cable.rogers
| reply to PuZo10 I just received an email similar to this. I was running Shareaza yesturday and one of my shared files was a Microsoft product. This is the program that was mentioned in the email.
There is no chance it was calling home or anything. Here's a copy of the email: quote: Dear Mr XXX
Rogers Cable (Rogers) has received a notice stating that activities associated with your IP address are infringing copyright in material(s) owned or exclusively licensed by others.
The relevant portions of the notice are appended to this e-mail.
Under the Rogers Yahoo! Hi-Speed Internet End User Agreement (EUA) and Acceptable Use Policy (AUP), you are prohibited from using the Rogers Yahoo! Hi-Speed Internet service to engage in illegal activities, including activities that infringe copyright. Copies of our EUA and AUP are available at:
»help.yahoo.com/rogers
Where there has been a violation of our EUA and/or AUP, including the unauthorized distribution of copyright-protected material, Rogers has the right to take appropriate action against you.
If you have any questions about the attached copyright notice, please contact the sender of the notice using the contact information provided in the notice. Please do not reply to this e-mail.
We trust you will comply with our policies and all applicable laws in using the Rogers Yahoo! Hi-Speed Internet service.
Sincerely,
EUA Management Team Rogers Yahoo Hi-Speed Internet
»na.edit.client.yahoo.com/rogers/···rm=terms 00266865
ss Software Alliance (BSA) and The Canadian Alliance Against Soft= ware Theft (CAAST) has determined that the connection listed below, which a= ppears to be using an Internet account under your control, is using a Gnute= lla network to offer unlicensed copies of copyrighted computer programs pub= lished by the BSA's and CAAST's member companies.
Site Details: ---------------------------------------------- Date Found: 19 Nov 2005 05:51:26 EST (GMT -0500) Network: Morpheus IP Address: XX.XX.XX.XX IP Port: 1720 Protocol: Gnutella UserName:=20
Content being offered: ---------------------------------------------- Filename: XXX.iso Filesize: 607,939k
The above computer program(s) is/are being made available for copying, thro= ugh downloading, at the above location without authorization from the copyr= ight owner(s). THIS IS A VIOLATION OF CANADIAN COPYRIGHT LAW AND, WE ASSU= ME, OF YOUR TERMS OF SERVICE.
Based upon BSA's and CAAST's representation of the copyright owners in anti= -piracy matters, we have a good faith belief that none of the materials or = activities listed above have been authorized by the rightholders, their age= nts, or the law. BSA and CAAST represent that the information in this noti= fication is accurate and states, under penalty of perjury, that it is autho= rized to act in this matter on behalf of the copyright owners listed above.
We hereby give notice of these activities to you and request that you take = expeditious appropriate action to prevent the illegal reproduction and dist= ribution of pirated so
Any advice or thoughts on this would be great. |
|
 darrylr
join:2003-02-10 Nepean, ON
| quote: Any advice or thoughts on this would be great.
A couple of choices...
1) Ignore the email since they can't touch you under the current laws in Canada. The only thing that could ever happen is Rogers may cancel your service if you get enough of these but I don't know of anyone who has had this happen to them.
2) Stop sharing copyrighted material and you will not see any more emails like this one.
-Darryl |
|
  root9
join:2005-04-08 Kitchener, ON
| Hello ppl, First let me tell you that Im a Network & Systems Analyst and been on Internet ever since Fishnet [start of Internet as we know it]. All this experience must be worth something .. lol.
Anyway: To test your claims I installed the thing and I received same kind of emails from Rogers about Visualroute, all 3 of them. First of all; Visualroute reports home first to be able to use the software per each start. I checked with packet sniffer. Visual servers verify reg. code and then automatically send email if correct licensed copy is not found. Rogers gets it and in their infinite wisdom shoot off email to you / me. Visualroute is registered in USA but not in Canada, that I have been able to find. [keep this in mind for later]. Rogers thinks now and since it amalgamated with [sold out to] Yahoo, Homestead, Gygablast and others that it can do anything it pleases. Most of their EUA is bull and most likely illegal. Still fighting them on this one .. lol
Now that we got that out of the way; Visualroute has been pilfering people for cash in the worst way for last few yrs. Since they dont hold an International copyright they have no leg to stand on outside the USA! Remember this since its very important for other software as well. Visualroute has no option but to let you / me keep on using it since the cost of stopping you / me is much higher than they can afford to prosecute. Ever try to get blood out of a rock? Rogers can and will cut your / my services if you / I continue to use Visualroute. Been there done that .. get it? So will Sympatico, Telus, Sprint and others. Its better to go with a small ISP anyway. In reality if you can find a way to stop Visualroute from reporting then go nuts, and send me a copy just to piss Visualroute coder off! You have my support because of way owner of Visualroute charges way too much for not so good software and which reports privacy settings to their server.
Just for reference: And if owner of Visual route reads this ,, be my guest ,, Ill sue your ass for gathering private data in your home state! I started to receive massive Spam from your contact. Check your laws .. I did.
Im looking for a much better software or will ask friends to code it so it finds Spammers / Intruders home address, not just ISP and node info. Might just post Visualroute owners info on all channels if he doesnt change his tune.
As a final note: software should be no more than $5 to $15 for OS or major application. All smaller and add-on software should be less. Anything above that is a rip-off. Remind Microsoft of that every chance you get.
Switch to linux, it has all the toys and better for free |
|
  FishPants The Art Of Pants Premium join:2001-11-19 Canada Eh?
| reply to PuZo10 Anyone with time on their hands could stick it to the company doing this. Get the IP Ranges for major ISPs (Bell, Rogers and so on) then set up a packet generator that would include a new IP address on every single packet (since it seems the source IP is actually part of the transmission). Once Rogers/Bell etc receives 60,000 of these messages they will simply deep-six them and ignore visual route.
If only I had more time on my hands! -- Hail to the Nipple-Titan. |
|
  uncomn_cents
@cable.rogers
| reply to Wheemer Perhaps this article will shed some light on this.
»www.ctv.ca/servlet/ArticleNews/s···NewsAt11
The way I read the warning email, they do not say you are in violation of their EUA. They simply state infringing copyright violates the EUA and what they can do if they find you are in violation.
They also say to contact the original sender of the complaint. Translation. "Don't reply to us how your sharing of whatever was found does not infringe on copyright. Tell the complainant."
This sounds like a notice and notice regime to me. Unless someone has been kicked off for copyright infringment (noone I know) |
|
  sbrook Premium,Mod join:2001-12-14 H0H 0H0 | And that law has just gotten delayed. |
|
 HughR
join:2005-12-03
| reply to root9 Warning: I Am Not A Lawyer.
said by root9 :...ever since Fishnet [start of Internet as we know it]. What was Fishnet? I don't remember it. Neither does Google nor does wikipedia.
Anyway: To test your claims I installed the thing ...
Experiments are good things. An added dose of facts is useful.
Visual servers verify reg. code and then automatically send email if correct licensed copy is not found. Rogers gets it and in their infinite wisdom shoot off email to you / me.
As far as I can see, Rogers is not participating in any possible copyright violation, so this is none of Rogers' business. I presume that Rogers' crude mechanism cannot discern this, but it is likely significant.
Visualroute is registered in USA but not in Canada, that I have been able to find.
Registered for what? Copyright registration is not required under the Berne convention. Canada and the US recognize each others copyrights as signatories to Berne.
As a final note: software should be no more than $5 to $15 for OS or major application. All smaller and add-on software should be less. Anything above that is a rip-off.
Surely the vendor gets to set the offer price. The customer gets to accept the offer or not.
Switch to linux, it has all the toys and better for free  That's what I do. But remember that "free" is not just the price. Also: the GPL is using copyright law, not ignoring it. |
|
 Yatti4209
join:2006-02-02 Waterloo, ON | reply to PiedPiper1 Dont reply to that email, I think piedpiper meant 1720. |
|