Search:  

 
 
   All ForumsHot TopicsGallery






how-to block ads


 
Forums » Tech and Talk » OS and Software » All Things Unix » OS X client, linux server, samba pain.
Search Topic:
Share Topic:
RSS topic:
toggle:
flat / full
normal / watch
Posting:
Post a:
Post a:
netstat segmentation fault »
« Simplify it for me please...  
AuthorAll Replies


Crypto
Premium
join:2001-01-07
Saint Charles, MO


1 edit
reply to wmcbrine
Re: OS X client, linux server, samba pain.

Yes, I've considered it and utterly rejected the concept as rediculous.

I've found that NFS is terrible for most client/server installations, honestly. Linux has a lousy NFS server, the protocol itself is terrible for security up until nfsv4 and then it's not well supported. The authentication is ugly as well up to v4 and relies on UID/GID, which arent usually homogenous in my environments. Maybe if you're in an entirely UNIX environment it's okay, but this is not where I am.

SMB and CIFS are excellent cross-platform implementations. When one's network consists of one Linux server and a bunch of PC's with a few macs thrown in, samba is the logical choice. NFS is a needless security risk and simply asking for trouble, IMO.

So, no. I'm not going to set up NFS just for a few macs. I just want to fix whats wrong with samba.
--

I may not agree with what you say, but I'll defend your right to encrypt it.

manifest
bitches

join:2004-08-14
Hartford, CT

When you say slow, do you mean responsiveness of the share or how fast the data is sent? I have a linux server running gentoo and samba 3 2 pc's and a mac mini. I can get 9mb/s from linux to mac and vice versa. When I upgraded from 10.3.9 to 10.4 on the mac I noticed about a 3mb/s increase.


Crypto
Premium
join:2001-01-07
Saint Charles, MO

When I say 'slow' I mean that the data moves at under 1MB/sec via samba. Oddly, writing to the linux samba share is a little faster than reading from it.

It moves at close to wirespeed using any other transfer method, like scp or ftp

I have not shared out anything on the OS X boxes, because they are not servers, and I dont care how the OS X smbd performs.
--
I may not agree with what you say, but I'll defend your right to encrypt it.


sporkme
drop the crantini and move it, sister
Premium,MVM
join:2000-07-01
Morristown, NJ
·Optimum Online

said by Crypto See Profile :

I have not shared out anything on the OS X boxes, because they are not servers, and I dont care how the OS X smbd performs.
You may not care, but you may gain some insight by trying that.
Forums » Tech and Talk » OS and Software » All Things Unixnetstat segmentation fault »
« Simplify it for me please...  


Saturday, 05-Dec 18:40:30 Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Hosting by www.nac.net - DSL,Hosting & Co-lo | feedback | contact
over 10 years online! © 1999-2009 dslreports.com.
page compression OFF
Most commented news this week
· [163] Comcast Releasing Promised Usage Meter
· [147] Avast Antivirus Has Gone Mad
· [128] Comcast Makes NBC Universal Acquisition Official
· [105] The Bandwidth Hog Does Not Exist
· [104] Graduate Student Unveils Sprint's GPS Sharing With Feds
· [101] Google Invades ISP, OpenDNS Turf With Google Public DNS
· [85] FCC Ponders Moving From PSTN To IP Voice
· [81] Latest Consumer Reports Survey Not Kind To AT&T
· [80] New Bill Aims To Limit ETFs
· [74] Sprint Defuses GPS Privacy Media Bomb
Most people now reading
· False positive in Avast! or is it real? [Security]
· Wife might have to work in.... Iowa for a few months!!! [General Questions]
· First commercial tool to crack BitLocker arrives (Updated) [Security]
· 3.x Feral Druid - Bear Tanking Guide [World of Warcraft]
· Windows 7 boot manager editing questions [Microsoft Help]
· [How to] Install Asterisk on an Asus WL-520GU router [VOIP Tech Chat]
· Connecting to Google Voice Via SIP [VOIP Tech Chat]
· RG Firmware update to VDSL2 this morning [AT&T U-verse]
· UPS - What do you people think happened? [General Questions]
· ToC 4th boss - Preliminary Strategy for Twin Valkyr [World of Warcraft]