RadioDoc
58ef2c0
Premium,ExMod 2000-03
join:2000-05-11
 ·AT&T Midwest
| reply to jgandy
Re: non-SBC POP failing
Telnet works for me...
C:\>telnet 207.155.252.31 110
+OK POP3 Server Ready. [ISafe POP3 Proxy]
quit
+OK Connection closing
Connection to host lost.
C:\>
"Telnet for SMTP didn't work either when the port was blocked by SBC."
That would be expected, wouldn't it, since the filter is on port 25 outbound? Your POP3 provider is evidently having problems since there is no POP3 (port 110) filter.
--
Let me see you make decisions, without your television. |
|
TheDuck
join:2003-06-22
Eastlake, OH | reply to jgandy
I tried a tracert from here and the last entry says it is unreachable..... |
|
jgandy
@emhril.ameritech
| reply to jgandy
Tracing route to pop.mindspear.com [207.155.252.31]
over a maximum of 30 hops:
1 12 ms 10 ms 10 ms adsl-68-78-135-254.dsl.emhril.ameritech.net [68.78.135.254]
2 12 ms 10 ms 10 ms dist2-vlan50.emhril.ameritech.net [68.22.72.67]
3 10 ms 10 ms 11 ms bb2-g1-0-1.emhril.ameritech.net [68.250.251.2]
4 12 ms 11 ms 11 ms ex2-p5-0.eqchil.sbcglobal.net [151.164.42.139]
5 11 ms 11 ms 12 ms asn2828-xo.eqchil.sbcglobal.net [151.164.248.198]
6 13 ms 12 ms 12 ms p5-0-0.RAR1.Chicago-IL.us.xo.net [65.106.6.133]
7 66 ms 56 ms 36 ms p6-0-0.RAR2.Denver-CO.us.xo.net [65.106.0.25]
8 36 ms 36 ms 36 ms p0-0-0d0.RAR1.Denver-CO.us.xo.net [65.106.1.73]
9 68 ms 68 ms 68 ms p6-0-0.RAR1.SanJose-CA.us.xo.net [65.106.0.21]
10 68 ms 67 ms 68 ms p0-0-0d0.RAR2.SanJose-CA.us.xo.net [65.106.1.62]
11 68 ms 68 ms 68 ms p15-0.DCR1.DC-Fremont-CA.us.xo.net [65.106.2.154]
12 68 ms 68 ms 68 ms 205.158.60.166.ptr.us.xo.net [205.158.60.166]
13 68 ms 68 ms 68 ms DSR1.dc-fremont-ca.us.xo.net [205.158.60.229]
14 * * * Request timed out.
15 69 ms 68 ms 69 ms agamemnon.cnchost.com [207.155.252.31]
Trace complete. |
|
jgandy
@emhril.ameritech | reply to RadioDoc
Intermittent service now. It was on part of the day yesterday, now its back down again.
Telnet for SMTP didn't work either when the port was blocked by SBC.
I'll give my hosting provider a call tomorrow if its still down. |
|
schja01
I need to get a life.
Premium,MVM
join:2000-04-27
Morton Grove, IL
clubs:   | reply to jgandy
What changes did you make to your firewall?
Fess up.
J
--
"Have I said something amiss?" |
|
RadioDoc
58ef2c0
Premium,ExMod 2000-03
join:2000-05-11
·AT&T Midwest
| reply to jgandy
Re: non-SBC POP failing
If telnet to 110 didn't work, your POP server is down. Try running a traceroute to it to see if you have a path to it. If so, call the provider because the server died. SBC does not filter port 110. That would be too insane even for them... 
--
Let me see you make decisions, without your television. |
|
jgandy
@emhril.ameritech | reply to jgandy
Its weird, I tried telnet on 110 but no luck. Web access is working but long term that won't help me.
Thanks. |
|
Riss_Centaur
Mod'taur - - - - 4 On The Floor.
Premium,MVM,Ex-Mod 2005-07
join:2004-01-20
other
clubs:
| reply to jgandy
No one else has indicated any problem with the POP 110 port. And there would be no good reason SBC would ever block that. SMTP port 25 yes, but 110 no.
Might be a transient pop server issue with SBC. Give it a little time, In the mean time go through the standard stuff at your end: Check for malware/viruses, check settings in mail client, etc.
-Riss
--
I have a plan so cunning you can pin a tail on it and call it a weasel!
Anyone who takes any of this seriously, deserves to! |
|
jgandy
@emhril.ameritech | I had an issue a couple of weeks back with SMTP failing. Today my POP failed and I am unable to receive email normally.
Is there a known issued with POP being blocked by SBC? |
|
