republican-creole
Search:  

 
 
   All ForumsHot TopicsGallery






how-to block ads


 
Forums » Google Building Massive Fiber Network » Likely?
Share Topic:
RSS topic:
toggle:
flat / full
normal / watch
Post a:
Post a:
why??? »
« GoogleNET  
L2006

join:2001-12-03
Stratford, ON

Re: Likely?

free ad-driven tv?

TV to the house should be free now... for every 20 min of television, there are 10 min of commercials it seems.

I mean, if commercials pay for the content, what is my huge monthly bill paying for?

calvoiper

join:2003-03-31
Belvedere Tiburon, CA

Re: Likely?

uhhh, that was exactly my point. We had (actually, still have) free BROADCAST television, but most choose to pay for additional channels....

calvoiper
--
VoIP--the death knell of remaining voice monopolies!

tiger72
SexaT duorP
Premium
join:2001-03-28
Saint Louis, MO
clubs:
·T-Mobile US
·RoadRunner Cable

Re: Likely?

said by calvoiper See Profile :

uhhh, that was exactly my point. We had (actually, still have) free BROADCAST television, but most choose to pay for additional channels....

calvoiper
I think his point is that you still get ads on cable anyways - why are you paying for it?
--
In a fascist government, National Security ALWAYS trumps Personal Freedoms.»quackleducks.blogspot.com/
gpancner

join:2001-09-27
Nine Mile Falls, WA

No such thing as Free BROADCAST TV

The amount of money spent on advertising over "Free" Broadcast TV adds over $600/year to the cost of living per capita in the U.S. via increased prices for goods purchased.
Have you ever seen a "Free" Broadcast TV station facility?
They didn't pull the constuction/operation money out of a hat.
Drex_CS

join:2005-05-11
canada
you pay for them to broadcast it, the ads pay for the 6 million an episode cost taht friends had.. and other such shows.

calvoiper

join:2003-03-31
Belvedere Tiburon, CA

Re: Likely?

OK, everybody, if you don't like "free" ad-driven services, don't watch or use them. What I don't understand is the attitude that others shouldn't be able to choose to use a service delivery mechanism just because you don't happen to like it.

Unless you are all ISP shills (which I doubt) I can't understand the hostility to the possibility of Google providing a "free", but ad-driven, wireless Internet access program. Could someone clue me in?

calvoiper
--
VoIP--the death knell of remaining voice monopolies!
Forums » Google Building Massive Fiber Networkwhy??? »
« GoogleNET  


Tuesday, 24-Nov 05:34:19 Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Hosting by www.nac.net - DSL,Hosting & Co-lo | feedback | contact
over 10 years online! © 1999-2009 dslreports.com.
page compression OFF
Most commented news this week
· [84] New AT&T Ad Campaign Hits Back At Verizon
· [55] New Bill Takes Aim At Higher Verizon ETFs
· [30] AT&T Offers New Prepaid Wireless plans
· [29] Earthlink Suffers From Major E-mail Outage
· [26] Frontier Increases Modem Rental Fee
· [13] Vivendi In Way Of Comcast's NBC Desires
· [12] Charter Still Fighting With Creditors
· [7] Monday Morning Links
Most people now reading
· Windows 7 boot manager editing questions [Microsoft Help]
· Big Bank Alternative to Bank of America? [General Questions]
· Connecting to Google Voice Via SIP [VOIP Tech Chat]
· 3.x Feral Druid - Bear Tanking Guide [World of Warcraft]
· Using DIR-615 C1/3.01 with Trendnet TEW-652BRP in N Mode [D-Link]
· Firearms: Ammo question. [General Questions]
· What to use while demonoid is down? [Filesharing Software]
· IE8 InPrivate filter from adblock plus list [Microsoft Help]
· [WIN7] Outlook express under Windows 7? [Microsoft Help]