calvoiper
join:2003-03-31
Belvedere Tiburon, CA
| reply to Azio
Re: Who Cares
said by Azio :
... The UN can't run anything without turning it into a disaster.
Give us one example that is not military or Iraqi in nature. Sudan?
Unicef?
UN HQ personnel management?
Bosnia? (Oh, sorry, that WAS military--at least it became so by the time Clinton had to bail out the UN, though it started as "aid".)
BTW, the Internet began as a military communications protocol for command and control messages. So wouldn't that disqualify it from the list of "non-military" things you think the UN might be capable of managing without FUBARing?
calvoiper
--
VoIP--the death knell of remaining voice monopolies! |
|
kapil
The Kapil
join:2000-04-26
Chicago, IL |  reply to noone1
The proof of burden? |
|
noone1
join:2004-06-04
Nashua, NH
1 edit | reply to Azio
Can someone PLEASE tell me WHY we should change the current means of Governance?
I do not accept, "Its a world resource." This is not a valid argument since many of the world's resources are controlled by a limited number of governments.
So, tell me...
1. What is *broken*
2. How it will be fixed
3. How no OTHER problems will arise
You MUST address ALL three points.
The burden of proof is on those who want the change.
*edit due to lysdexia. Thanks Kapil for pointing it out* |
|
Azio
@shawcable.net
| reply to TKJunkMail
Keeping the UN from ruining the internet is the best thing that could happen. The UN can't run anything without turning it into a disaster.
Give us one example that is not military or Iraqi in nature. Better yet, explain how the ITU is a disaster. |
|
