jp10558
Premium
join:2005-06-24
Willseyville, NY
| reply to en102
Re: Typical...
Well, I don't think there needs to be a new law, just enforcement of the old laws.
IIRC the reason CHEEZ WHIZ or whatever that canned chedder like stuff is that is pressurized isn't called Cheese Whiz is because legally they cannot call it cheese as it does not contain cheese. Also why Velveta isn't marketed as cheese.
Well, this would seem to be a cut and dry application of that law. You can't call something with a finite and specific amount of allowed use an unlimited use service. I'm not sure why they aren't being sued under those laws.
And with VoIP, it's not even ambiguious as to what the unlimited might refer to as it may be with data services - I mean, it's not unlimited time connected, and I can't see any way they could claim it's unlimited data transferred during the x minutes.
--
Opera 8.5(Build 7700); Windows XP Pro SP2;Athlon 64 3400+; 1GB PC3200 DDR; 1M/128k DSL; NOD32(Version 2.5.25); Outpost Pro 2.7;Proxomitron 4.5j Grypen 8/28/05(Opera mod),GPG ID:0x0A1C6EE3 |
|
JoshNJ
Premium
join:2001-12-25
Freehold, NJ
| said by jp10558  :IIRC the reason CHEEZ WHIZ or whatever that canned chedder like stuff is that is pressurized isn't called Cheese Whiz is because legally they cannot call it cheese as it does not contain cheese. Also why Velveta isn't marketed as cheese. both cheez whiz and velveeta do indeed contain cheese and are both considered cheese
»en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cheez_Whiz
--
I support the RIAA |
|
joebrumbe
join:2004-12-04
Akron, OH |  This is a good example of the importance of the internet as a learning tool. Where else could you find such insignificant information in an instant and send it out to the world. We are all better off as a result. |
|
