Titus Pullo
I came, I saw, I slept
join:2004-06-26
 ·Embarq
| reply to noone1
Re: Disgusting
What I'm talking about goes back to Socrates; and, in more modern times, I believe in so far as the social contract, John Locke.
FWIW, to promote the general welfare and provide for the common good is part of the preamble, but what I'm actually alluding to goes to basic humanism -- not a document. It springs from philosophy, not political doctrine.
--
"The limits of tyrants are prescribed by the endurance of those whom they oppose." -- Frederick Douglass |
|
Titus Pullo
I came, I saw, I slept
join:2004-06-26 | reply to John Galt
You're flat out wrong. |
|
John Galt
Forward, March
Premium
join:2004-09-30
Happy Camp
·CenturyLink
| reply to Titus Pullo
said by Titus Pullo  :snip! This "social contract" is one that you are wanting to impose on those who do the "heavy lifting" in the society.
The problem is that you and your "looter ilk" wouldn't recognize "heavy lifting" if it bit you.
--
A is A |
|
noone1
join:2004-06-04
Nashua, NH
| reply to Titus Pullo
said by Titus Pullo :I think it predates those folks. It read it as common sense humanism. Google "Social Contract" for yourself and see you can decide for yourself. If you want to know what our countries "Social Contract" is then read the Constitution. Here are a few interesting facts you might not know.
There is no phrase "Separation of Church and State" in the Constitution. The constitution only outlines that the government shall establish no religion; a far cry from the "separation" movement.
Under the original Constitution, it was illegal for the federal government to have an income tax or social security, etc.
The only role for the Federal Government was to support a limited military that could be bolstered, if needed, by its armed citizenry (2nd amendment).
The individual states were left to decide how they would run their own governments.
There was no "Social Good" considered unless you consider the fact that the government was NOT supposed to be a "safety net" responsible for the "social good." The government was supposed to get OUT of your way.
Good is a subjective.
The US Constitution does not outlay and "Social Contract" for free Wifi like the Mayor in this article states is a "civil right" |
|
Titus Pullo
I came, I saw, I slept
join:2004-06-26
·Embarq
| reply to noone1
I think it predates those folks.
It read it as common sense humanism. Google "Social Contract" for yourself and see you can decide for yourself.
--
"The limits of tyrants are prescribed by the endurance of those whom they oppose." -- Frederick Douglass |
|
noone1
join:2004-06-04
Nashua, NH
| reply to Titus Pullo
said by Titus Pullo :On the contrary: the social good is part of the social contract. If you don't know what that concept is, you should want to know. No disrespect intended at all - I just think it's very important. Who defines "Social Good"? You, Teddy Kennedy? Karl Marx? Pat Roberts? Sounds like legislating morality. |
|
Titus Pullo
I came, I saw, I slept
join:2004-06-26
·Embarq
| reply to John Galt
said by John Galt :said by Titus Pullo :..."Social Good"... is a key phrase for Looters. Decrypted it means "why should I do for myself when I can take it from YOU?" Mr. Thompson's office called...you're going to be late for the broadcast. On the contrary: the social good is part of the social contract. If you don't know what that concept is, you should want to know. No disrespect intended at all - I just think it's very important.
--
"The limits of tyrants are prescribed by the endurance of those whom they oppose." -- Frederick Douglass |
|
